Interprofessional staff update on HIPAA

 

 

Prepare a 2-page interprofessional staff update on HIPAA and appropriate social media use in health care.
Introduction
As you begin to consider the assessment, it would be an excellent choice to complete the Breach of Protected Health Information (PHI) activity. The activity will support your success with the assessment by creating the opportunity for you to test your knowledge of potential privacy, security, and confidentiality violations of protected health information. The activity is not graded and counts towards course engagement.
Health professionals today are increasingly accountable for the use of protected health information (PHI). Various government and regulatory agencies promote and support privacy and security through a variety of activities. Examples include:
• Meaningful use of electronic health records (EHR).
• Provision of EHR incentive programs through Medicare and Medicaid.
• Enforcement of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) rules.
• Release of educational resources and tools to help providers and hospitals address privacy, security, and confidentiality risks in their practices.
Technological advances, such as the use of social media platforms and applications for patient progress tracking and communication, have

 

Sample Solution

The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) is critical in protecting the privacy of health care information. In order to ensure compliance with HIPAA regulations, all healthcare professionals must be aware of the requirements for appropriate social media use in health care.

As social media usage increases among patients, providers must be aware of its potential risks and benefits. Social networking sites may provide a great opportunity for education, community outreach and communication between organizations and patients. However, it is essential to understand how to protect patient privacy when using these platforms (Young et al., 2019). Healthcare organizations must develop policies that address the appropriate use of social media by staff members, including guidelines on how to store records securely as well as what content can be shared publicly about patients or their treatment (Lambert & Paicely, 2017).

When discussing patient information online, health care providers should avoid sharing any identifiable patient data such as name or other personal identifiers (Young et al., 2019). Furthermore, they must bear in mind that even if a message appears anonymous or private on social media platform can still be accessible by others if posted publicly. As such, all messages should adhere to HIPAA requirements at all times (Lambert & Paicely ,2017).

It is important to remember that while there are many advantages associated with professional use of social media platforms within healthcare settings there are also some potential drawbacks which need to be taken into consideration when deciding whether or not it is appropriate for an organization’s HIPAA compliant policies(Young et al., 2019). Therefore it is essential that interprofessional teams take the time necessary to understand the implications for using these mediums appropriately so that both patient privacy and effective communication can co-exist without incident(Lambert & Paicely ,2017).

ver, we can likewise contend that the conflict can never be the final retreat, considering there is generally a method for attempting to keep away from it, similar to authorizations or settlement, showing Vittola’s hypothesis is defective. Fourthly, Vittola inquiries upon whose authority can request a statement of war, where he infers any republic can do battle, yet more critically, “the ruler” where he has “the normal request” as per Augustine, and all authority is given to him. This is additionally upheld by Aristotle’s Politics ((1996), Page 28): ‘a lord is the normal prevalent of his subjects.’ However, he really does later underscore to place all confidence in the sovereign is off-base and has outcomes; a careful assessment of the reason for war is expected alongside the eagerness to arrange rival party (Begby et al (2006b), Page 312& 318). This is upheld by the activities of Hitler are considered treacherously. Additionally, in this day and age, wars are not generally battled exclusively by states yet in addition non-state entertainers like Al-Queda and ISIS, showing Vittola’s regulating guarantee on power is obsolete. This is additionally upheld by Frowe’s case that the pioneer needs to address individuals’ inclinations, under authentic power, which joins on to the fourth condition: Public statement of war. Concurred with many, there should be an authority declaration on a statement of war (Frowe (2011), Page 59-60&63). At last, the most dubious condition is that wars ought to have a sensible likelihood of coming out on top. As Vittola repeated, the point of war is to lay out harmony and security; getting the public great. In the event that this can’t be accomplished, Frowe contends it would be smarter to give up to the foe. This can be legitimate in light of the fact that the expenses of war would have been greater (Frowe (2011), Page 56-7). Subsequently, jus promotion bellum contains a few circumstances however in particular: worthy motivation and proportionality. This gives individuals an aide regardless of whether entering a war is legal. Notwithstanding, this is just a single piece of the hypothesis of the simply war. In any case, it very well may be seen over that jus promotion bellum can be bantered all through, showing that there is no conclusive hypothesis of a simply battle, as it is normatively guessed.

Jus in bello
The subsequent area starts unraveling jus in bello or what activities could we at any point characterize as passable in wars (Begby et al (2006b), Page 323). To start with, it is never to kill blameless individuals in wars, upheld by Vittola’s most memorable recommendation deliberately. This is broadly acknowledged as ‘all individuals have a right not to be killed’ and assuming a fighter does, they have disregarded that right and lost their right. This is additionally upheld by “non-warrior resistance” (Frowe (2011), Page 151), which prompts the subject of soldier capability referenced later in the exposition. This is confirmed by the besieging of Nagasaki and Hiroshima, finishing the Second World War, where millions we

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.