Define intersectionality, then focus on the diverse attributes of those populations and try to anticipate at least one unintended consequence that would affect them adversely. Discuss specific diversity attributes of the population and how implementation of the policy may put them in a vulnerable position. Explain the severity of the unintended consequence for at least one group. Support your post with properly cited references from your scholarly readings.
Intersectionality is a theoretical framework that acknowledges how various social identities (race, gender, class, sexual orientation, ability etc.) “intersect” with each other and create unique experiences of oppression and discrimination (Crenshaw, 1989 [invalid URL removed]). Policies, while intended for the greater good, can have unintended consequences that disproportionately burden marginalized groups due to their intersecting identities.
Example: Affordable Housing Policy
Consider a policy promoting affordable housing initiatives. This policy, on the surface, seems beneficial for low-income residents. However, let’s analyze how it might have unintended consequences when considering intersectionality:
Severity of Consequence:
For low-income residents of color, this scenario creates a financial strain. They may have to choose between affording rent and affording transportation to maintain employment. This can exacerbate existing racial and economic inequalities.
Other Intersectionalities to Consider:
Conclusion:
Policymakers must consider intersectionality to anticipate how seemingly positive initiatives might have unintended consequences for marginalized groups. By conducting a thorough impact assessment that considers diverse identities, policymakers can create more equitable and inclusive solutions.