Find a data science application published in an online journal (which one does not matter) and summarize the paper. Including an overview of the approach, a link to the online version of the paper, a reference to the paper, a description of the dataset used, as well as strength and weaknesses (450 to 550 words). Your submission has to be in your own words, copying and pasting the abstract or anything else from the paper will not gain you any marks.
Submit your answer to this question as a pdf via this dropbox. Email submissions are not accepted.
Assignment 1 Question 2
Imagine a collection of nuts and bolts that are all together in one pile on a table. Describe, in pseudocode, how you would find all matching pairs of nuts and bolts. You need to find one solution for each of the problem-solving approaches given below. For each of your solution, determine how many comparisons of pairs of nuts and bolts you might have to make in the best- and worst- case scenario. You can assume that there are complete pairs, no single nuts or bolts, and that for each bolt, there is exactly one nut that fits. Describe a solution to the nuts and bolts problem (in pseudocode) using a Brute Force Approach.
Submit your answer to this question as a pdf via this dropbox. Email submissions are not accepted.
Assignment 1 Question 3
Imagine a collection of nuts and bolts that are all together in one pile on a table. Describe, in pseudocode, how you would find all matching pairs of nuts and bolts. You need to find one solution for each of the problem-solving approaches given below. For each of your solution, determine how many comparisons of pairs of nuts and bolts you might have to make in the best- and worst- case scenario. You can assume that there are complete pairs, no single nuts or bolts, and that for each bolt, there is exactly one nut that fits. Describe a solution to the nuts and bolts problem (in pseudocode) using a Divide and Conquer Approach.
Submit your answer to this question as a pdf via this dropbox. Email submissions are not accepted.
ay is a reflective essay based on Kolb’s (1984) cycle of reflective learning I will be reflecting upon my experience as part of a group in which the end result was presenting a group presentation. Reflective practice is a mixture of deliberate and calculated thinking alongside more spontaneous thoughts (Neilson, Stragnell & Jester, 2007). Kolbs (1984) cycle consists of four stages. The first stage is concrete experience, which is when the experiences occur or are completed. The second stage is the reflective observation stage whereby the person reflects on the experience. The next stage is abstract conceptualisation this is concluding and learning form the experience. The final stage is active experimentation which involves planning and trying out what you have learned. Kolbs model creates an action plan similar to that in Gibbs (1988) model. In compression in John (2017) model the emphasis is more on retrospective reflection rather than active experimentation.
Concrete experience: we were split into groups in our seminar. I was in a group of 5 and I was lucky enough to know one member of my group but I had never met the other four (who all new each other). From the first group meeting I nominated myself to be the leader and so was involved in delegating tasks to the other team members. This was difficult as at least one of our team members were absent per meeting despite this, due to there being at least 4 team members per meeting there was no social loafing, as predicted by (Klung & Bagrow, 2016). Due to not everyone turning up to every meeting it was hard to contact those who were absent to explain to them what they needed to do creating extra work. However due to social media I was able to make contact with them and explain the tasks to the absent team members. The creation of the PowerPoint was a gradual process that we started during our first seminar and was completed four days before we were due to present our presentation. We faced similar challenges which were also faced in multidisciplinary team (MDT) meeting (Kassianos, 2015) such as availability problems with everyone taking different modules and so having a different schedule and outside of university commitments made it challenging to find a time that suited everyone. I was lucky enough to get on very well with all group members the group was very cohesive which in turn produced a positive group working environment. We ran through the presentation before we presented it to the gro