Introduction to Theatre

 

Play review Format
The standard play review contains five paragraphs. There are other approaches you can use, such as comparing two plays in one review or writing longer reviews for one play. But traditionally, a play review will analyze several elements of the production in five paragraphs, including:
Paragraph 1: Your introductory paragraph should describe what you saw on stage. You should also give context for the play, such as the playwright or composer of the play and where the play is being staged.
Paragraph 2: Briefly summarize the plot of the play.
Paragraph 3: Discuss the acting and directing. React to the performers playing the characters in the play.
Paragraph 4: Describe the design elements of the production, such as the lighting, sound, costumes, make up, and set and props.
Paragraph 5: React to the play as a whole. Would you recommend the play to potential audience members? You can also include a recommendation, like a star rating or thumbs up/thumbs down.

Writing the Review Guidelines
1.
Look at the play’s program. Try to get to the theater or production setting 15 minutes before show time. Flip through the play’s program. Look for a director’s note and the cast biographies. You should also check if there are any understudy replacements for the production, especially if the show is promoting itself based on the popularity of a certain performer.
• Note if there are any write ups in the program about a directorial choice, like setting “Hamlet” in contemporary times. There may also be notes on the lighting or the sound design.
2.
Take notes during the show. It’s important to write down any striking details during the production. But try not to bury your head in your notebook during the entire production. You may miss certain details or a key moment. Use the intermission, which usually happens between acts in a play, to take more detailed notes. Consider:
• The set design. Look at design elements like lighting, sound, costumes, makeup, and props.
• The acting and directing of the production. If a certain casting choice seems important, write it down. If a line of dialogue strikes you, make a note of it. Look at the way the actors say their dialogue and move around the stage. Are they serious, comedic, formal? Do they use modern slang or speech, even though the play was originally set in an older time period?
• Any “special effects” used, such as special lighting, sound or technology. Note if the production also uses audience participation to keep the audience engaged.
• Right after the performance, you should jot down any concluding notes, including your initial impressions of the production and how successful or unsuccessful you think the production was.
3.
Write a rough draft of the review right after you have seen the production. The longer you wait, the less you’ll remember your experience of the play. Remember your role as a critic is to describe, analyze, and judge. In your review, you will need to:
• Describe what you saw in detail and make the reader see what you see. Be specific and thorough in your descriptions.
• Analyze what you think the director or designer was trying to achieve. Why do you think they designed the movements, lights, sound effects, and costumes a certain way? What do you think they were trying to make the audience feel or think?
• Judge how effective the play was as a whole. Don’t be afraid to give an honest opinion of the production but be sure you can back up your critique in the body of your review (paragraphs 2-4).
4.
Create a strong hook or line to open the review. You may start with a summary of the play if it is a re-staging of a production your audience is familiar with.
• For example, in this review of “The Little Shop of Horrors”, the reviewer begins with the line: “This Fringe classic pops up most years, with songs such as ‘Somewhere That’s Green’ and ‘Don’t Feed the Plants’ bringing the house down.”
• This opening line works because it allows the reader to dive right in. In one line, the reviewer has introduced the play, noted the play is a “classic” and told the reader it is a popular musical.
• You can also start with a hook that challenges the audience’s expectations of a familiar production. For example, in this review of “The Little Shop of Horrors”, the reviewer begins with the line: “Not many musicals will issue you with a sing-a-long book with the lyrics to chorus numbers so you can join in, but this interactive production of The Little Shop of Horrors has a few surprises in store.”
• This hook works because it tells you that the play is a unique take on a classic production and is interactive.
5.
Answer who, what, where, and when in paragraph 1. The introductory paragraph should cover basic information about the play, including:
• The full title of the play.
• Where did you see the show? Name the theater or setting where you saw the play.
• When did you see the show? Maybe it was opening night, or the last week of the show’s run. Be specific about the exact date you saw the show.
• Who wrote the show? Who directed the show? Name the playwright, the director, and the name of the production company.
• If the show is a re staging of an existing play, such as “The Little Shop of Horrors” or “Hamlet”, you should note this in your introduction. If the show is a new or original production, you should also note this.
6.
Discuss the plot in paragraph 2. Briefly summarize the plot of the play, including the setting, the main characters, and the story arc of the characters. Try to keep the summary to one or two lines. You should give the reader just enough information to get a general sense of the play’s plot.
• For example, you may summarize the plot of “The Little Shop of Horrors” with: “The Little Shop of Horrors is such an entertaining musical because of its hilarious plot involving a plant which grows to an incredible size and the romantic love story of Seymour and Audrey.”
7.
Talk about the acting and directing in paragraph 3. React to the performers playing the characters in the play. Use their real names and their character names. Write about the acting based on questions such as:
• Were the performers believable? Did their relationships or chemistry with the other characters seem natural and appropriate? Did the performers stay in character throughout the play?
• Did the performers have a vocal quality (volume and articulation) that fit the context of the play? Did their body movements and gestures stay true to the character they were playing?
• Were the performers engaging and interesting to watch? If so, why did you find them engaging?
• For example, in your review of “The Little Shop of Horrors” you may note: “The main credits of this production go to the lead roles Cath Snowball (as Audrey) and Chris Rushmere York as Seymour who created a really tangible but very shy and coy chemistry.”
8.
Analyze the design elements of the play in paragraph 4. The design elements are a big part of a production and should be discussed in detail in your review. Focus your analysis on:
• The set and the props: Did they establish the correct mood for the play? Did they add to the development of the characters, the plot, and the setting? Were they convincing and well-made?
• Did the blocking on stage make sense? Blocking means how the actors are positioned on stage within the set. Were there any awkward movements by the actors on stage? Did the set help or hinder the performances?
• The lighting: Did the lights convey a mood that fit with the tone of the play? Did they draw attention to characters or props that seemed important in the play?
• The costumes and the make-up: Did the costumes and the make-up of the performers suit the time period of the show? Was there a unique approach to the costumes or the make-up that affected the context of the play?
• The sound: How did the music, if any, contribute to the show’s mood? Were there sound effects used in the show, and if so, how did they add to the production? If you are reviewing a musical, you should note if there was a live orchestra or if the music was prerecorded, and how that affected the tone of the play overall.
• Try to be as detailed as possible in your discussion of the design elements. For example, in a review of “The Little Shop of Horrors”, you may note: “A quirky directorial decision was to have the props and cast in grey scale. These performers were caked in grey and black make up to contrast the monstrous green plant as it ate people alive, growing bigger and bigger as the play went on.”
9.
React to the play as a whole in paragraph 5. Here is where your final critique should be in the review. Avoid clichéd phrases like “the play was bad” or “the production wasn’t very entertaining.” Instead state your opinion of the performance as a whole, and show why your response to the play is valid and significant. The rest of your review should support your overall judgment of the play.
• Note if the audience seemed attentive and interested throughout the performance. Also point to any possible adjustments or changes that could have been made to the production to make it stronger or more engaging.
• For example, you may note: “Though the production was clearly taking some creative risks by having all the performers in grey scale, not bringing in bright green plants for the show-stopping “Something Green” number felt like a missed opportunity to capitalize on this contrast.”
• Leave your reader with a clear sense of your opinion on the play and with more questions than answers about the play. For example, you may wrap up your review of “The Little Shop of Horrors” with: “This new production takes some creative risks and emphasizes the singing skills of the performers, who manage to pull off this tale of love and a monster

Sample Solution

growth. The symptomatic rules incorporate a pulse that surpasses 140 mmHg (systolic) and 90 mmHg (diastolic) and concurrent location of proteinuria estimated to be more than 0.3 g/day. Frequently toxemia is additionally went with edema. Without clinical mediation toxemia can prompt kidney disappointment, liver break, stroke, eclampsia with seizures and HELLP disorder. 2

The conclusive justification for toxemia is yet to be found however might be related with oxidative pressure, angiogenic factors, invulnerable reaction among mother and placenta and shallow placentation.3 The rate is higher among primipare than multipara and diabetes, kidney and immune system problems, high age and family background of toxemia seem, by all accounts, to be inclining toward preeclampsia.2

In toxemia pregnancies the existence of the mother is at primary goal. Gentle toxemia can be checked habitually while serve toxemia frequently requires hospitalization. Patients will be treated with antihypertensive prescriptions and magnesium sulfate to forestall seizures.1 The main mediation to fix toxemia is birth, which makes sense of that pretty much every toxemia pregnancy prompts preterm birth. Incited preterm birth can be important to save the mother’s life but at the same time is pivotal to the kid. Whether and when to incite conveyance is a choice in light of both the states of mother and youngster, however with the mother as first priority.2 Numerous entanglements seen after toxemia are expected to preterm birth. One of the greatest issues is respiratory misery disorder. Respiratory pain disorder happens without even a trace of surfactant in the lungs upon entering the world, bringing about breakdown of the lungs. 4 It has been for the most part accepted that the fetal lung development and generally speaking fetal development is expanded in pregnancies confounded by toxemia, which is believed to be a characteristic variation to the unpleasant climate in uterus. 5 Additionally, harking back to the 1970’s and 1980’s a low occurrence of RDS was displayed among muddled pregnancies with expanded L/S proportion in outcome supporting the on going perception.6. Anyway late examinations 5,7-9 have scrutinized the connection between expanded FLM and toxemia. Thus the need to reveal insight into this matter is underlined.

In this paper I will look at the hypothesis that toxemia prompts expanded development of the lung capability in preterm newborn children and in light of the result talk about whether the babies ought to be dealt with in any case

Techniques
This paper depends on articles found on PubMed information base with access through Aarhus college library. The articles are picked concerning their capacity to illuminate the connection among’s toxemia and fetal lung development as well as the components and treatment of toxemia. I have been utilizing different mix of Cross section terms, some of which I made up myself as well as other people tracked down in past articles, among these; Toxemia, respiratory pain condition, fetal lung development/capability, L/S-proportion, LBC, corticosteroiLecithin/sphingomyelin proportion and lamellar body count
The lecithin/sphinomyelin(L/S) proportion and lamellar body count(LBC) are two out of a few test for fetal lung development. Both test are intrusive which is related with a little gamble of unnatural birth cycle or preterm work. The test comprises in infusing a long needle through the stomach and into the uterus where amniotic liquid is gathered. The methodology is called amniocentesis.12

The L/S proportion is consistent until week 30 after which lecithin increments however sphingomyelin stay constant. This outcomes in an expanded proportion. The higher the proportion, the better the lung development. In everyday the L/S proportion should be more than 2.0 to surpass the acknowledged proportion wherein is related with an okay of respiratory pain disorder.

LBC express the structure surfactant takes when put away in type 2 pneumocyts and is expanded during pregnancy why it is likewise an approach to foreseeing FLM. 13

A concentrate by Stimac, T. et al. (2012) inspected the relationship among’s toxemia and FLM by utilizing LBC.8 The review depends on a partner of 306 pregnant ladies who were classified in to four gatherings. The ladies were isolated into three gatherings; 25 ladies were remembered for the gathering of toxemia, 74 ladies were remembered for the gathering of IUGR, 63 in the gathering of both IUGR and toxemia and 144 were incorporated as controls. As found in the figure beneath, the various gatherings have about a similar LBC before week 31 of development. The levels in this way start to expand, LCB levels in toxemia pregnancies somewhat more slow than different gatherings. In any case, at term (week 37-39) the levels abruptly expansion in the gathering of toxemia, which can be added to the way that the gatherings are tiny, and not very many toxemia ladies arrives at full term.

Figure 1:

The lamellar body countsinn, H. N. et al. (2000) additionally analyzed the effect on fetal lung development in preeclampsia.9 In this study the not entirely settled by the L/S proportion. The review populace comprised of 90 patients who had been exposed to amniocentesis to test for fetal lung development. Out of 90 patients 59 were delegated patients with preterm work without toxemia and 31 were named patients with toxemia. The two gatherings were matched in fetal age, equality and race. The outcomes showed a huge expanded FLM in the gathering of preterm patients contrasted with the toxemia patients.

Regardless of the tiny review populace this concentrate likewise shows no proof that toxemia ought to affect the FLM, indeed it really demonstrates a deferred FLM.

The L/S proportion and LBC are much of the time used to gauge FLM. Anyway the L/S proportion just considers lecithin and sphingomyelin forgetting about a few different phospholipids. In view of it the idea of microviscosity will be presented underneath.

Fetal lung development in light of the microviscosity of amniotic liquid
The microviscosity of the amniotic liquid incorporates all phospholipids why it likewise is a pertinent proportion of FLM.14 The microviscosity is impacted by the phospholipid by diminishing at higher focuses.

The microviscosity is estimated by fluorescence polarization of amniotic liquid taken through amniocentesis. A fluorescent hydrocarbon test is added to the amniotic liquid and lit by captivated light. At high phospholipid focus a bigger measure of test will be bound and less fluorescent spellbound reaction will appear.15

Simon, N. V. et al. (1982) directed a concentrate by involving microviscosity to foresee fetal lung development in convoluted pregnancies.15 The review included 252 ladies without confusions, next to preterm work, as controls and 172 ladies with various types of complexities among these diabetes, persistent hypertension and pregnancy-prompted hypertension. From the benchmark group a reference variable for FLM where made to connect with gestational age viewed as 4.8. A critical lower worth of microviscosity where found while checking out at the gathering of hypertensive. At the point when division constant and pregnancy-instigated hypertension a lower esteem where found for ongoing hypertensive emphazing the impact of the pressure span.

This study didn’t look at the impact of toxemia yet found that hypertensive problem in pregnancy, including pregnancy-prompted hypertension, diminishes microviscosity demonstrating expanded fetal lung development. It likewise tracked down microviscosity as a decent estimation to foresee FLM. in the various gatherings as an element of gestational age.

Unique figure from T. Stimac et al. (2012)8

This study gives no data that validates the proposition that toxemia usefully affect fetal lung development.

Winn, H. N. et al. (2000) additionally analyzed the effect on fetal lung development in preeclampsia.9 In this study the not entirely set in stone by the L/S proportion. The review populace comprised of 90 patients who had been exposed to amniocentesis to test for fetal lung development. Out of 90 patients 59 were delegated patients with preterm work without toxemia and 31 were named patients with toxemia. The twds, 11ßHSD and so forth. Likewise, studies have additionally been found via looking through the reference list tracked down in past examinations. While picking the articles, I have attempted to be pundit towards old examinations since they might be obsolesced. Since not very many examinations have been looking through this particular subject, I have fundamentally ensnared a portion of these articles in this paper.

Fetal lung development in toxemia
Toxemia can prompt placental deficiency a condition with progressing debasement of placenta capabilities prompting further absence of oxygen and nutrients.10 The subsequent hypoxia enacts the fetal hypothalamic pituitary adrenal hub prompting cortisol discharge. 11

The consolidated information about cortisol levels increments under toxemia and that clinical corticosteroids have brought down the frequency of respiratory pressure condition might have come about in the

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.