Is it ethical for psychologists to deceive research participants on the methods and objectives of their research?

 

 

Is it ethical for psychologists to deceive research participants on the methods and objectives of their research? What are ways that protect subjects from participation in experiments that might be harmful to them? Things to discuss are: informed consent, human subjects committee, APA guidelines for ethics with animals and human subjects and subject debriefment. Similarly, why are double blind experiments done?

Sample Solution

Deception in Research

The use of deception in psychological research is a complex and controversial issue. While it can sometimes be necessary to obtain accurate data, it raises ethical concerns about informed consent and the potential for harm to participants.

Ethical Considerations:

  • Informed Consent: Participants must be informed about the nature of the research, including any potential risks or discomforts. They should also be given the option to withdraw from the study at any time.
  • Human Subjects Committee: Research involving human participants must be reviewed and approved by an institutional review board (IRB) or human subjects committee. These committees ensure that research is conducted ethically and that participants are protected from harm.
  • APA Guidelines: The American Psychological Association (APA) has established ethical guidelines for research with human participants. These guidelines address issues such as informed consent, deception, confidentiality, and debriefing.
  • Subject Debriefing: After participation in a study, participants should be debriefed about the purpose of the research and any deception that was used. This allows them to understand the rationale for the study and address any concerns or questions they may have.

Double-Blind Experiments

Double-blind experiments are conducted when researchers want to minimize the potential for bias in their studies. In a double-blind experiment, neither the participants nor the researchers know who is receiving the experimental treatment and who is receiving the control treatment. This helps to ensure that the results of the study are not influenced by expectations or biases.

Reasons for Double-Blind Experiments:

  • Reduces Bias: By preventing researchers from influencing participants or interpreting results based on their expectations, double-blind experiments can reduce the risk of bias.
  • Enhances Validity: Double-blind experiments can increase the internal validity of research by minimizing the effects of confounding variables.
  • Improves Credibility: Double-blind studies are generally considered to be more credible and reliable than studies that are not double-blind.

In conclusion, while deception can sometimes be necessary in psychological research, it must be used ethically and with careful consideration of the potential risks and benefits. Informed consent, review by an IRB, and debriefing are essential components of ethical research. Double-blind experiments can help to minimize bias and improve the validity of research findings.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer