Jacques-Louis David, Death of Marat

 

 

 

Jacques-Louis David, Death of Marat, 1793, oil on canvas compared to Henry Fuseli, The Nightmare, 1781, oil on canvas

Select a Neoclassical and Romantic work of art that we have covered in this course and answer the following questions in essay form:

1. What are the stylistic similarities and differences between the two artworks?

a. Be sure to analyze the stylistic characteristics of each artwork and any stylistic inspiration from past period styles.

b. Don’t forget to apply art historical vocabulary (from the Glossary) in your analysis.

2. What role does cultural context play in the similarities or differences between these two artworks?

a. Discuss the subject matter of each artwork as well as how the cultural context may have informed the choice of subject matter.

b. In order to understand its cultural significance, you may want to consider who commissioned the artwork and what its intended function was.

 

Sample Solution

The Neoclassical painting Death of Marat, by Jacques-Louis David (1793), and the Romantic painting The Nightmare, by Henry Fuseli (1781), share several stylistic similarities and differences.

Stylistically speaking , both paintings feature a limited color palette with a focus on contrasting light & dark tones as well as subtle details to capture the essence of the scene depicted. This can be seen in their use of bold brush strokes to create dramatic lighting effects that further contribute to overall dynamic composition within each work . Additionally , there is also evidence of past period influences where Fuseli’s piece borrows from Baroque era staging techniques characterized by its emotive figures set against an unidentifiable space (Durozoi 2010) while David pays homage to classical sculpture through his depiction of Marat’s body posed like a martyr from antiquity (David 2019).

Despite these similarities however , significant differences between these works exist when it comes to their respective motifs and subject matter. For example, Death Of Marat conveys a sense of solemnity & tragedy while The Nightmare presents more sinister atmosphere due its expressionist quality which heightens tension with its contorted figures & wild eyes placed in painterly landscape setting -all elements intended to evoke fear or dread(Fuseli 2020). Consequently , these two works are able demonstrate how neoclassical & romantic styles continue draw inspiration from past periods while still evolving in unique ways.

In conclusion, while Jacques-Louis David’s Death Of Marat and Henry Fuseli’s The Nightmare have many stylistic traits in common such as their use similar colorscapes or artistic techniques drawn from previous eras . They also differ greatly when it comes down tonality & themes present within each piece making them perfect examples for demonstrating the range found within Neoclassicism & Romanticism respectively.

wandered confidence, inspiration and conduct’. See reflection on example plan..) To get around this issue I found with composing the assessments, understudies told me verbally what their code did and I assisted them with building their assessment. The more I did this they started to execute this without anyone else. This could be connected to the absence of proficiency abilities of certain understudies as education isn’t just about having the option to compose however to likewise talk and tune in such that allows us to convey successfully and figure out the world. (Public proficiency 2014). A proposal if I somehow happened to utilize this approach again is make some composing outlines for these understudies to assist them with building their assessments and some model assessments. This would be separated, yet I could likewise give understudies a showing of the assumptions which upholds the demonstrating approach the movement for the people who require it (Bandura1961).

Consecutively, the examples following on from this movements of every kind focussed on numeracy. Understudies need to have a vital comprehension of math to consolidate these abilities in to the programming exercises. Allude TO Writing HERE. For what reason DO Understudies NEED TO KNOW THIS. There are loads of chances in Software engineering when numeracy can be applied. In each movement understudies led, they connected with genuine models (Addendum). As should be visible from understudies work, we began from the groundworks of essential expansion of two whole numbers then, at that point, based on this once the establishments where set up. Showing Standard 4 expresses that as instructors we want know about students’ capacities and their earlier information, and plan educating to expand on these (DfE, 2011). The example plans support this and it was crucial I had some awareness of understudies abilities and the series of examples based on their generally existing information. In the event that understudies needed numeracy abilities, they could never have had the option to advance through the exercises as understudies were expected to test the results of each program (understudy work). On the off chance that understudies don’t comprehend essential number frameworks, BIDMAS and information type’s understudies wouldn’t be aware assuming their result was right. To help learning, understudies had a printed rendition of the correlation administrators that would be utilized in the exercises.

The exercises led separated in trouble with understudies advancing at their own rate. All through every one of the examples there were entire’s to team up learning and talk about key elements of Python and their coding.

Appraisal occurred all through the series of examples. This was the initial 3 examples of a progression of 8. Understudies led different programming exercises in the wake of being shown the substance. Brown and Knight (1994) expressed that evaluation is significant as it is an exhibition marker for both staff and understudies and gives chances to cure botches. Great verbal input was given during each programming movement and this propelled understudies. Showing Standard 5 expresses that we ought to give understudies normal input, both orally and through exact stamping, and urge students to answer the criticism. (Supplement) I utilized terms, for example, ‘nearly’ and ‘almost’ during verbal criticism empowering the right reaction from the understudy, as opposed to them depending on me offering them the response; a term Davies (1998) called evaluative tuning in.

Understudies started to gain from their errors and feature botches in their assessments. Songbird et al. (1996) expressed that appraisal ought to likewise zero in group working, critical thinking and relational abilities. These abilities are adaptable abilities that can be utilized in a wide range of branches of knowledge, in addition to in the public eye. Not in the least did the conversations during my illustration feature this yet it gave opportunity for me to check precisely where understudies where on a singular level to separate and make arrangements for this. I did this by re-organizing my s

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.