Kant & Mill

According to Mill:

“actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness.”

(i)Explain what Mill means by this claim and give two examples, one of a person doing something wrong according to your opinion, and one of a person doing something right or acceptable according to your opinion, which agree with this principle.

(ii)Be sure to explain what Mill thinks happiness is and isn’t and give examples. (see essay on Hedonism)

(iii)Is happiness our only goal? Are there other goals? Like money? Virtue? Knowledge? Love? Fame? What does or would Mill say about these?

(iv)Kant: What is Kant’s first and second categorical imperatives? Give examples of each and explain both as much as possible.

(v) Imagine that the only way to save one hundred thousand people from dying is to kill one 8 year old child. (Make up a story where this is a fact) Would Kant agree that it is morally acceptable to kill the child? Would Mill? Do you? Explain.

(vi)Try to adjudicate: which theory seems better, Kant or Mill’s, if any? Do not forget to tell us what is the acceptable thing to do regarding the 8 year old child!

Sample Solution

Use of compensation and incentives is an importance practice in HRM as it has the following advantages. First, to many employees, the basic purpose for joining an organization is to secure a pay. The value placed in such a pay and not necessarily the amount/size motivates the employees more, and as result higher productivity levels are reported. Second, compensation facilitates hiring, retention, promotion and evaluation of the workforce. Without mentioning aspects of compensation, the HRM office might find it impossible to convince people to join the organization to work or even the existing employees to assume higher responsibilities (Armstrong, 2006). Third, compensation displays legality of a contract/employment. For a contract to be valid there has to be a consideration, which is partly what a pay or remuneration package serves. Compensation, especially bonuses, which practice sharing of profits with the employees, creates a sense of belonging to the employees. This is extremely important in securing employees’ loyalty during hard times in managerial practices.

In addition, compensation assists in valuing an organization as well as determining its future. Once the HRM office is capable of properly remunerating workforce, the employees are almost assured of their organization’s survival. Usually, when an organization is going under receivership, employees are the first victim as there is reduced employee compensation, which may in acute scenarios deny them their basic livelihood. Finally, compensation and incentives are the easiest motivational practices available for use by the HRM. This is because compensation is directly linked to employee’s welfare more than the improvement of working conditions (McCoy, 1999).

HRM at Coca Cola Company

Coca Cola Company is one of the leading beverage production companies. The firm that traces back its existence in 1886 ascribes to the philosophy that, it is people and not technology cre

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.