Based on major court cases and legislation pertaining to ELLs, create a brochure or newsletter to be used to
inform parents of ELLs about legislative events that have affected English language instruction in Arizona.
Part 1 of your submission should include a brief description for each of the following:
At least two of the following major court cases pertaining to ELLs: Lau v. Nichols, Castaneda v. Pickard, Flores
v. Arizona, or Plyler v. Doe.
At least two of the following federal laws or mandates that have affected education for ELLs: Every Student
Succeeds Act (ESSA), Title III, Title VI, or a resolution from the Office for Civil Rights/Department of Justice.
At least two of the following Arizona laws or policies that have directly affected the ELL program model:
Proposition 203, House Bill 2010, House Bill 2064, and Move On When Reading.
Part 2
With the submission of Part 1, write a 500-750 word description of the ELLs and program model in Arizona.
Part 2 of your submission should include:
A brief explanation of the demographic composition of the PK-12 ELL population in Arizona.
An explanation of the process of determining ELL program eligibility, including the use of the Home Language
Survey and the Arizona English Language Learner Assessment (AZELLA) for placement and reassessment.
A description of the standard accommodations available to ELLs for assessment.
A description of the characteristics of the English immersion program model in Arizona in terms of time
allocations, grouping of ELLs with native speakers, use of ELLs’ native language, and integration of English
within academic content.
A statement regarding the differences between Structured English Immersion classrooms, bilingual
classrooms, and Individual Language Learner Plans and how they relate to current societal trends and issues
in the education of ELLs.
The advantages of pH-sensitive nanoparticles over other nanoparticles include: (a) the majority of carriers have been used as enteric-coating materials for a long time, and their safety has been approved. (b) The carriers show rapid drug release and then high drug concentration gradient as they undergo quick dissolving at definite pH and definite sites. The phenomenon is beneficial for the drug absorption. (c) They improve drug absorption comparing to the other conventional nanoparticles as they turn from the solid state to the hydrogel state at certain dissolution pH and so, the bioadhesion of the carrier to the mucosa becomes greater at specific fragment. (d) The drug stability can be enhanced more effectively using pH sensitive nanoparticles. Different materials can be used for preparation of pH-sensitive nanoparticles: a- pH-sensitive nanoparticles prepared from polyanions: Such as Eudragits and HPMC phthalate. b- pH-sensitive nanoparticles prepared from publications: Chitosan is the main cationic polymer used to prepare pH-sensitive nanoparticles. It is the second most plentiful polymer in nature after cellulose. c- pH-sensitive nanoparticles prepared from the mixture of polyanions and polycations: Some techniques have been improved using the advantages of both polyanions and polycations [97,108, 113-116]. Most of the nanoparticle systems related consist of the positive-charged chitosan and a negative-charged polymer, such as Eudragit [97, 115, 117], poly (g-glutamic acid) [113, 114, 116]