Key strategic leadership issues (such as privacy and fake news) facing Facebook leaders

 

Question I – This chapter discusses some key strategic leadership issues (such as privacy and fake news) facing Facebook leaders Sheryl Sandberg and Mark Zuckerberg. Consider other firms mentioned in the chapter such as Amazon, PepsiCo, Uber, VW, and Starbucks. What social and ethical issues do the leaders of these firms face today? Choose a firm or industry and explore the relevant controversial issues it faces. How should strategic leaders address the major issues you have identified?

The “job to do” approach discussed with the Clayton Christensen milkshake example can be useful in a variety of settings. Even when we are the customers ourselves, sometimes we don’t look for better solutions because we get into routines and habits. Think about a situation you sometimes find frustrating in your own life or one you hear others complaining about frequently. Instead of focusing on the annoyance, can you take a step back and look for the real job that needed doing when the frustration occurred? What other options can be developed to “do the job” that may lead to less irritation in these situations?

Sample Solution

Founded in 2004, Facebook went public a mere eight years later on May 18, 2012. Facebook purports to operate by five core values. As they claim on their Facebook page, the five values “guide the way we work and the decisions we make each day to help achieve our mission.” I have no idea when the values were made official by Facebook, but since going public, it is hard to suggest that Facebook has been using any of them as values guidepost. Facebook employees say Mark Zuckerberg`s obsession with growth has overridden ethical concerns and allowed hate speech and incitements to violence to spread unchecked, internal messages leaked to media outlets show.

systems and strategy; particularly concerning ethnic networks. The actual report remembers seventy proposition of suggestion to handle prejudice for the police force; with the race relations regulation being a significant arrangement to further developing methodology as well as an examination concerning the Metropolitan police force for institutional bigotry and the disappointments in regards to strategy encompassing the Stephen Lawrence case (The Guardian, 1999).

The homicide of eighteen-year-old Stephen Lawrence happened 22nd April 1993 where the young fellow was wounded bringing about his passing; despite the fact that, it was only after January 2012 that two people were seen as at real fault for his homicide (BBC, 2018). The Macpherson report that followed the homicide framed changes by and by this incorporated the “abolishment of the twofold risk rule”; under the steady gaze of this regulation was nullified an individual couldn’t be attempted once more for a wrongdoing they had recently been viewed as not liable for, this was an essential change in strategy as it prompted the conviction of the people saw as at legitimate fault for Stephen Lawrence’s homicide (The Guardian, 2013). This proposes a constructive outcome on policing methodology as cases succeeding the Stephen Lawrence case might have not accomplished a conviction had the twofold risk rule not of been nullified. This is obvious in the ‘Innocent bystanders murder as this adjustment of strategy emphatically affected policing systems as the police had the option to utilize new measurable proof 32 years after the fact to convict the killer of the two youthful casualties (BBC, 2018).

Bowling and Phillips (2002, refered to in Newburn, 2017, p.854) proposed that the proposals that were framed in the Macpherson report drove “to the most broad program of change throughout the entire existence of the connection between the police and ethnic minority networks.” This proposes a beneficial outcome of the Macpherson report as because of a portion of the progressions in strategy and police systems actioned by the suggestions illustrated has implied that the police have started to recapture the trust of ethnic minority networks; which will uphold police practice from here on out.

The 2009 Home Affairs advisory group report composed decade after the Macpherson distribution features if and how the seventy improvement recommendations illustrated in the report had been met at season of distribution; the Home Affairs report featured that Dwayne Brooks proposed a significant region for movement was the “presentation of properly prepared family liason officials in basic episode” (Parliament, 2009). The report features that this vital improvement in police method encompassing suitable preparation for family liason officials to manage basic occurrences has further developed family liason official’s capacity to have the option to ‘keep up with associations with families’, while getting fundamental proof and further developing trust in the police inside the African American population (Parliament, 2009). Subsequently, proposing that this change in policing method and strategy, because of the Macpherson report, has made a positive difference, particularly inside the ethnic co

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.