read the scenario detailing the labor relations grievance you’ll be discussing. Then, answer the questions below. The answer to each question should have its own dedicated paragraph, consisting of approximately 4-6 sentences each. This assignment is a writing/research exercise, so please verbalize self-created full sentences in paragraph form, and refrain from using bullet-style lists.
1. You are the arbitrator tasked with deciding this case. The question you must answer is: Did the employer violate the provisions of the collective bargaining agreement (CBA) when it denied bereavement leave to the grievant? Explain your reasoning. As part of your response, identify the relevant language from Article 23 of the CBA that led to your decision. (Hint: remember you are a neutral third-party and your primary responsibility is to interpret the language of the CBA)
2. Describe some actions that both the employer and the union could have taken to avoid this conflict. Be specific.
Labor Relations Grievance Arbitration – Bereavement Leave
As the arbitrator in this case, I must determine whether the employer violated the collective bargaining agreement (CBA) by denying bereavement leave to the grievant. My decision hinges on the specific language within Article 23 of the CBA.
Here’s why the employer might have violated the CBA:
If Article 23 defines bereavement leave broadly, encompassing the death of a spouse, child, parent, or sibling, then the employer’s denial could be considered a violation. This interpretation aligns with common bereavement leave policies and recognizes the emotional distress experienced during these life events.
However, the employer might have grounds for denial based on the CBA wording:
If Article 23 narrowly defines bereavement leave, excluding the specific relationship for which leave was requested (e.g., grandparent, friend), the employer may have acted within the agreement’s bounds.
Ultimately, my decision rests on a neutral interpretation of Article 23’s language. Ambiguous wording should be interpreted in favor of the employee; however, clear limitations within the article would uphold the employer’s decision.
Actions by the Union:
Actions by the Employer:
By taking these steps, both the union and the employer can work towards clear communication and minimize the chances of similar grievances arising in the future