Lack of mental health resources in michigan

 

In many organizations, a formal research proposal, or a less formal research plan, is a necessary precursor to a full-length report, such as an informational report or recommendation report. A research proposal is intended to help you:

Find and articulate a problem that can be addressed with research (a problem as it exists for an actual group, company or organization).
Develop patterns of inquiry with suitable research questions and methods.
Discover your strengths and weaknesses as writers and researchers, so you can budget your time and energy (and assign roles if working in a team), and realistically manage your project expectations.
Formally plan your project’s lifecycle for collaborating, drafting, sharing findings, getting feedback, revising and editing — all of which should be established to the expectations of your team and instructor.
Assignment Prompt

Proposing a research report is a problem solving activity. The research proposal is not meant to propose a final “answer” to a problem. Instead, it is a “promise” to someone that you have a plan to perform useful research and writing about a problem and its potential solutions.

“Discovering” a problem to research can be a challenge, and it often requires collaboration among instructors and students to get beyond “tip-of the nose” problems. Problems affecting Detroit and Wayne State are often a good place to start (you can take look at the board of governors’ meeting minutes or the WSU strategic plan, for example), as well as problems related to the use or development of a technology affecting your fields, your institution(s), or your workplaces.

While you may format your 3-6 page proposal, in general, as seems logical to you, the following sections are suggested:

Summary
An Overview of the Problem or Opportunity
The Proposed Program or Plan of Work
Qualifications and Experience
Introduction
The introduction includes a strong draft of a problem statement, describing the problem or opportunity you will be addressing with your final report. Problem statements often take time to write well, and it’s possible that it will be significantly revised in the upcoming days and weeks (some technical communications courses spend entire semesters working on articulating problem statements). Good drafts of problem statements show a high level of audience awareness, or a ‘reader-centered’ focus on the problem. In other words, they strive to articulate the problem from your reader perspectives (the readers of your proposal and/or your final report) or stakeholder perspectives on the problem, and they include perspectives on the problem from primary and/or secondary research. You may also consider labeling or categorizing parts of the problem based on your current evaluation techniques or criteria for evaluating the problem (financial, sustainability, staffing, technological improvements, etc.). Problem Statements can include subcategories, such as “Criteria”, “Categories”, “Rearranged and Updated Problem Statements” (if the problem is following a recent report), or “Incomplete Problem Statements”.
The introduction contains a Purpose and Audience Statement to articulate the purposes and audience of your proposal and final report. You should also show understanding of your readers’ needs. You should also justify your choice of the genre for the final report you are planning to write (usually an informational report or recommendation report)
The introduction contains, if appropriate: a background on the problem, a discussion of your key sources of information, the scope and organization of the remaining proposal, a discussion of any key words or technical terms.
“The Proposed Program” or “Plan of Work”
This section offers a description of how you will gather and analyze research. It is the section where your readers will justify their decision about whether or not to support (or fund) your proposal. This section should include:
Some preliminary research results/findings.
Some justification for why you are engaged in forms of inquiry, such as:
site work (visiting and observing a site or online activity)
interview or survey work
data analysis (finding and representing salient data)
word work (thorough study of concepts or technical terms)
source work (secondary research / 3050 library guides
Description of Qualifications:
Describes your relevant skills and past work, as well as strengths and weaknesses, and any organizational or departmental resources you have access to.
Budget:
If appropriate, this section specifies how much the proposed program or work will cost, or (often the case in this class) the budgeting of your time and resources in terms of your project’s lifecycle for collaborating, drafting, sharing findings, getting feedback, revising and editing. This should include a timeline of dates and deliverables (including class due dates).

 

 

Sample Solution

How was development used as a military great situation in European colonization? In Jared Precious stone’s talk, “Firearms, Microorganisms, and Steel” He showed strong disputes with respect to how development gave them a titanic good situation in the midst of triumph. Precious stones’ best reasons will be explain in this work and used to look at this conflict. Anyway, Europeans had steel and weapons, the two things were used to butcher Neighborhood Americans in the cutting edge. Neighborhood Americans didn’t have about a comparable cautious layer and guns that Europeans did, they used stones and their family. Disorder expected a critical work in various achievement, especially in the midst of European triumph. Sicknesses would murder and spread among Neighborhood American peoples and abatement their general population numbers. This has happened in basically all domains in the world, the general population that lives in a particular sickness creates protection from it, but the people who don’t can without a very remarkable stretch pass on from it. Finally, the usage of training have Europeans and Spaniards a strategic position when it came to broadening. They knew how to examine and create, yet the Indians didn’t, so Indians were completely confounded. They would form their courses of action and guides on their next attack, and the Indians would never be aware. Europeans and Spaniards reliably understood what the Indians were doing, so they could never find them resting with a frightening attack or catch. Development was a gigantic military favored outlook to Europeans and Spaniard since they had the method for making steel, gather delivers, and go against disease through advancement

Jewel shows his dispute by introducing the utilization and making of steel in the European social class. They had loads of it, and they manufactured materials created utilizing steel to empower them to win wars and battles. They had steel swords, cutting edges, spears, and cautious layer to protect their bodies from any underhandedness. It was a deeply grounded truth that Neighborhood Americans were still in the “stone age” nevertheless relied upon stones, earth, and people to fight in battles. Valuable stone communicates, “The curiosity of ponies, steel weapons, and firearms without a doubt deadened the Incas at Cajamarca, however the fights after Cajamarca were battled against decided opposition by Inca armed forces that had previously seen Spanish weapons and ponies.” (pg. 73). Weapons expected a minor work in the disaster area, yet hugy impacted the Nearby Americans, intellectually. European weapons were their most imperative movement at this point, and were viewed as notable by their adversary. This caused Indians to feel frail and squashed without beginning the battle, it was embedded to them that they were no partner for these strong and impelled people. The inspiration driving for what reason is in light of the fact that it seemed like a Russian roulette redirection, no one knew when it would hit them or from where, the Spaniards picked their targets and ended. Regardless of the way that weapons in those days missed their goal piece of the time and expected a huge timespan to reload, it would terrified them to death.

Spaniards and Europeans knew how to examine and make, and the Indians didn’t, consequently why they were productive in getting their family. Their most imperative favored point of view wa

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.