Leaders from history

 

 

 

Identify two leaders from history, one dark (unethical) and one light (ethical).
Prepare a brief biography for each leader, focusing primarily on the event that makes them stand out in history.
Describe the leadership style the individual uses most and why.
Define the leadership style used by this leader.
Explain how the leader demonstrates this leadership style.
Analyze the particular act or behavior that makes this leader ethical or unethical.
Describe the effects the leader may have had on the organization they led.
Explain in first person the most important lesson you have learned from this course and how you can use this information in future situations.
The Comparing and Contrasting Dark and Light Leaders paper

Sample Solution

Leaders who fall on the light side of leadership are called ethical leaders while those who fall on the darkside are called unethical leaders. A leader whose personality is composed of a trio of negative personality traits: narcissism, psychopathy and Machiavellianism – is a dark leader. During his reign, Idi Amin was responsible for the killings of over 500,000 civilians. His atrocious acts earned him the title of “the butcher of Uganda” as mass killings were witnessed as well as violations of human rights. Martin Luther King, Jr. is an example of a light/ethical leader. Martin Luther King, Jr. (1929-1968) is one of the most talked-about leaders in history. He was a civil-rights activist and a Baptist minister who led the civil rights movement in the United States.

Teamwork plays an essential role within both Fiedler’s Contingency Theory and Chelladurai’s Multi-dimensional model particularly regarding leader-member relations, if the group are familiar and trusting of the leader policy implementation becomes much simpler. Similarly to leadership, understanding and adapting to the situation is key to a leader being able to implement policies that ensure a group work as a team. Teamwork is a product of good leadership, and is again the responsibility of the leader to ensure the group are working successfully together. Highly functioning teams are essential within organisations to increase productivity and member satisfaction, by utilising the talents of all group members effectively within the constraints of the task, personal relationships and the group goals (Pettinger, 2007). Figure 2: Tuckman’s Model of Group Development (Agile Scrum Guide, 2019) Tuckman in his Model of Group Development provides easily identifiable stages that a groups performance can be measured against, making it useful for monitoring performance, Figure 2 shows Tuckman’s model. Ranking group performance against this scale can provide leaders with a clear understanding of how the group are functioning, allowing them to implement policies to change this if performance is unsatisfactory (Pettinger, 2007). Within organisations, the theory can be loosely applied to creating teams by grouping familiar individuals with the aim that they will reach the norming and performing stage of the model quicker. For short and simple tasks this is an extremely effective way of organising groups, due to the increased short term productivity. However there are significant issues with grouping individuals in this manner, particularly when tasks become more complex, and ultimately the model should mainly be used for monitoring the progress of groups (Pettinger, 2007). Figure 3: Belbin’s Team Roles (PrePearl Training Development, 2019) A more functional approach of grouping individuals is to utilise Belbin’s Team Theory (Belbin, 2017). Belbin identifies 9 key roles that must be fulfilled within a group to ensure success, the role

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.