Identify a political leader, either current or past, local or national.
Describe personal characteristics and behaviors as well as situational factors that have contributed to the
leader’s success or failure.
Apply French and Raven’s four bases of power to this individual. Has the person used different bases of
power for different situations?
Using Fiedler’s contingency theory, how did situational factors contribute to this leader’s use of power?
Create a 2,000-2,500-word (body content) research paper that consists of eight journal articles (at least
four from the past 2 years).
The True Meaning of Absurd
GuidesorSubmit my paper for examination
The term silly is utilized when an individual faces an event that is past their understanding, when the
person is on edge, or can’t manage a specific issue (Fen 23). It would be somewhat reasonable for state
that, by and large, individuals abstain from putting forth the attempt to comprehend an idea that is
puzzling, rather marking the marvel as “crazy.” However, the expression “ridiculous” can have an a lot
further significance than normally considered. It is really a philosophical class that was generally utilized
by the acclaimed scholars of the twentieth century—particularly by the devotees to the school of
existentialism. Getting a handle on its different viewpoints would be valuable for the general peruser, just
as for understudies who study philosophy.absurd
Prior to continuing to the meaning of the term itself, it is enlightening to recollect the old Greek legend
about Sisyphus. As indicated by its most across the board form, Sisyphus was a lord and an erector of
Corinth. He figured out how to beguile and hold onto Thanatos, the divine force of death. Because of the
nonattendance of Thanatos, individuals quit kicking the bucket lastly, the divine beings got stressed over
this reality. They sent the lord of war, Ares, to free Thanatos, who wrested Sisyphus’ spirit. As a
discipline, Sisyphus was sentenced to roll an overwhelming stone to the highest point of a high mountain.
When the stone arrived at the summit, it moved to the lower region with the goal that Sisyphus needed to
begin from the earliest starting point.
The discipline given to Sisyphus is frequently observed as the pith of ridiculous. Subsequently, it tends to
be derived that ludicrous methods unexpected, or that it doesn’t fit in solid rationale. Merriam-Webster
online gives a few implications for the word silly: “1) absurdly irrational, unsound, or disjointed; 2) having
no balanced, or organized relationship to human life, lacking request, or worth.” According to
Dictionary.com, this term implies totally or clearly silly, outlandish, or false; in opposition to all
explanation, or presence of mind; ludicrously stupid, or bogus.
This is the means by which ridiculous can be comprehended on the regular level. Nonetheless, its
philosophical significance is additionally intriguing and adaptable. In this way, existentialism had produced
the entire teaching of absurdism, which portrays the connections between individuals, life and reality. This
convention had created after the world wars of the twentieth century, where a huge number of individuals
had passed on and endured, and different social aggravations happened (fen 34).
Absurdism was concentrated by numerous popular thinkers like Albert Camus, who devoted practically
the entirety of his attempts to this point. In the first place, the fantasy about Sizif was referenced. Camus’
most popular article on the subject of the preposterous was expounded precisely on Sizif. The rationalist
considers foolish to be a contention—an encounter between the human longing for significance and
clearness, and an impassive universe liberated from ensures. In this way, one has three different ways to
manage the foolish: ending it all, playing out an act of pure trust, or tolerating it. As per Camus, the last is
the main genuine way, which expect an individual comprehends that the universe is liberated from
absolutes (Liam 221). In this manner, an individual as an individual is additionally genuinely free and has
capacities and potential outcomes to make their own sense and motivation behind presence.
Soren Kierkegaard, another popular existentialist, fathoms silly as an equivalent word to Catch 22. He
characterizes it as an issue of confidence and the main wonders that permits an individual to put stock in
self. As indicated by his way of thinking, a person is an amalgamation of alternate extremes: endless and
brief, limited and unbounded, opportunity and commitment. Because of the union of these contrary
energies in a person’s awareness, one continually lives in dread and hopelessness (Liam 194). What’s
more, the more hesitance one has, the more profound these sentiments are. The main path for salvation is
confidence in God and this is the place preposterous comes in. Kierkegaard alludes to the scriptural
fantasy about Abraham and his child Isaac. As indicated by this legend, God expected Abraham to forfeit
his child to Him. Right now, confidence drove him to carry out a wrongdoing; it changed a homicide into a
demonstration of noble cause and all the while, where confidence had returned Isaac to his dad alive.
Confidence can’t be sensibly contended, however it works and this is crazy. People are free and this
opportunity lets them locate their own particular manner to God.
We can see the comprehension of preposterous is fairly multi-faceted. Ridiculous doesn’t really mean
threatening, futile, and denied in any sense. Much of the time, this term is as yet used to name certain
marvels and occasions as odd, incognizable, and undesirable—and yet, crazy can permit an individual to
locate an importance, a pith for which one is looking. Ludicrous contains a goals, now and again of an
issue that was created without anyone else. One may state that crazy has some sense, which is absolutely
preposterous.