Using the textbook “Leadership a communication perspective” 7th edition by Craig E Johnson and Michael Z Hackman complete the self assessment tests
and fill out the template below:
Leadership Development Self-Assessment Journal
Chapter ________
Self-Assessment Box ________
Overall Scores (2pts) Provide Scores of the completed assessment.
This section includes you showing proof of your scores, proof that you did the actual
assessment.
You may do this by doing the assessment directly in your book and taking a photo and inserting
it directly in your word document under this section. **It should not be a separate image
attachment, it needs to be directly inserted here!
OR
You may also do this by typing a version of the assessment here and showing your scoring.
**Version means you can either type the assessment out or type a shorthand version of it and
showing your accompanied scores.
Academic Relevance (5pts). I
In 1-2 short paragraphs provide an academic glimpse of your knowledge about the selfassessment. What it the assessment trying to achieve? This section is where you provide
evidence of your knowledge of the chapter and how it’s connected to the self-assessment.
Personal reflection: (8pts) In 1-2 SOLID paragraphs give a personal reflection of what you got
out of the assessment or what you didn’t and why. How you can relate or utilize the
assessment in your work or leadership strides? Provide reflection on what the instrument
reveals about your leadership behaviors and your effectiveness as a leader as well as thoughts
on how you can build on strengths and address any potential weaknesses
regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating to take note of that while there is a limited ability to recall lumps of data, how much pieces in every one of those lumps can change broadly (Miller, 1956). Anyway it’s anything but a straightforward instance of having the memorable option huge pieces right away, somewhat that as each piece turns out to be more natural, it very well may be acclimatized into a lump, which is then recollected itself. Recoding is the interaction by which individual pieces are ‘recoded’ and allocated to lumps. Consequently the ends that can be drawn from Miller’s unique work is that, while there is an acknowledged breaking point to the quantity of pi