Leadership Assessment

 

What personal strengths do you have that would make you an effective nurse leader? What potential gaps might you need to address to improve your ability to be an effective nurse leader?

As a future DNP-prepared nurse, you will be called upon as a leader in your field, a leader in your practice, and a leader in your organization. Throughout your program of study, you will develop the skills, strategies, and knowledge to not only harness this role successfully but to do so at a high level of achievement and performance.

 

Photo Credit: [Squaredpixels]/[iStock / Getty Images Plus]/Getty Images
However, everyone must acknowledge both their own strengths and weaknesses, as a leader, and identify potential areas of improve to enhance these capabilities.

For this Assignment, you will explore your strengths and potential gaps based on the nurse leadership competencies provided. Review the competencies that best fit into your current nursing role (nurse executive competencies, system CNE competencies etc…). Reflect on potential goals you might set to improve as a nurse leader. You will also reflect on how this goal setting and self-examination will not only improve your nursing practice but also your healthcare organization.

Note: You do not need to pay for the Nurse Leader Skill Assessment at the end of the competencies list provided.

To Prepare:
Review the nurse leadership competencies presented in the Learning Resources for this week.
Reflect on these competencies, and consider your own personal strengths and potential gaps in relation to these competencies.
Consider potential goals for your leadership development in relation to the nurse leadership competencies presented.
The Assignment: (4–5 pages)
Explain your self-assessment in relation to the nurse leadership competencies. Be sure to identify your strengths and potential gaps in relation to these competencies.
Describe at least four goals for nurse leadership development that you would like to pursue, given the results of your self-assessment. Be specific.
Explain why these goals are pertinent to your development as a nurse leader. How will developing these leadership competencies support your healthcare organization or nursing practice? Be specific.

Sample Solution

A leadership assessment is a test or set of tests used to assess a person’s ability to guide and guide. Employers and recruiters use these ratings to find the right leader for their organization. Popular skills that employers often seek include team management, task delegation, mediation, and creativity. However, “leadership” can have different meanings from company to company. Some organizations are looking for project managers who can lead existing teams, while others want risk-takers to inspire discouraged employees. A proper leadership rating can help identify a person’s leadership style and see if it meets your needs.

Concentrate of test “The board and Leadership” Running Header: Leaders and Managers Distinction Between Leaders and Managers and Leaders’ Role and Responsibility in Creating and Sustaining Effective Organizational Culture Name: College Name: Distinction Between Leaders and Managers and Leaders’ Role and Responsibility in Creating and Sustaining Effective Organizational Culture While certain individuals erroneously recognize supervisors with pioneers, there is checked contrast among pioneers and directors in their way to deal with work, individuals and issues. While administrators are needed to practice authority characteristics, not all directors are fit for becoming pioneers. Then again, successful pioneers ought to likewise show the board abilities so there are viable in hierarchical settings. Notwithstanding, regardless of whether an individual is all the more a pioneer or a chief will rely upon the prevalent attributes of initiative or managership. A hierarchical achievement will rely generally on the pioneers who will provide guidance and set vital targets, which will then, at that point, be overseen by supervisors. To choose, enlist and train or lucky man hierarchical pioneers versus administrators, it is important to recognize what separates a pioneer from a chief. Administration has been a part of human development from days of yore and has been practiced in administering clans to countries and in winning conflicts and confronting difficulties of cataclysmic events. Assumptions set upon Leaders yesterday and today will be pretty much the equivalent however the setting might contrast. Initiative characterized by Mescrn, Albert and Khedourn as “the capacity to impact people and gatherings to run after achieving authoritative destinations” is more lined up with the parts of administration with regards to the present Organizational and Business Leaders. Managership connects with accomplishment of hierarchical objectives in a viable and effective way through arranging, sorting out , driving and controlling authoritative assets. The principle distinctions among pioneers and chiefs have been recognized under four elements of plan creation, network advancement for plan accomplishment, execution and results. Pioneers build up essential course while supervisors plan and spending plan. Pioneers are equipped for adjusting individuals to the essential objectives where chiefs are simply ready to sort out staff. Where pioneers can spur and motivate, chiefs control and oversee. The results of pioneers are sensational and huge scope while chiefs produce unsurprising and requested outcomes (Armstrong and Kotler 2001). While pioneers, ordinarily have a response for each issue, the chiefs distinguish issues in each arrangement. Administrators will generally become engrossed with frameworks and subtleties, and soundness while pioneers advocate change and smoothness in status, which advances development and advancement. Authoritative pioneer determine their power through private appeal while the directors resort to the power, which their position awards them. Individuals the executives of pioneers and chiefs vary in the parts of how thoughts are conveyed. Pioneers sell their thoughts and cause them to turn into individuals’ thoughts, in this manner acquiring responsibility and motivation in seeking after the thoughts and objectives related. Then again the administrators advise individuals what to be done, some of the time ceasing from giving full subtleties of the circumstance and fall flat in moving and propelling individuals. One more stamped qualification among pioneers and supervisors in their subordinate dealing with is that directors assume the fault for blunders while administrators fault others. This frequently considers higher labor force moral when pioneers are available in hierarchical setting. Pioneers cultivate development and empower hazard taking. Supervisors on the other range keep away from dangers and target achieving set targets. In moving forward and setting headings, the pioneers have broad reasoning examples and take a gander at plain domains while chiefs like to investigate currently covered business possibilities and markets. At long last the pioneers are particularly separate by their groundbreaking way of driving individuals, where individuals are submitted and changed in to high performing and enlivened gathering coordinated towards accomplishment of a shared objective. Supervisors use conditional style in managing individuals, utilizing compensations, punishments and followers as method for attempting to acquire responsibility towards set destinations. With pioneers, authoritative objectives become shared dreams and a reason which requests to the heart and sought after with enthusiasm, while with supervisors they stay number games and simple yearly targets (ChangingMinds Org. 2005) Every association has its own extraordinary culture, which would have been most likely made unknowingly, in view of the upsides of the top administration or the authors or center individuals.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.