Leadership model

Use your selected company from Weeks 1-2 for this week’s assessment.

A primary technique of deeper analysis of an organization is the Porter’s Five Forces Model. This technique is often used when looking at your competitive advantage. Looking at your competitive advantage is important to aligning your operational needs with your business strategies.

Review sources on your company.

Write a 700- to 1050- word proposal to the company of your plan to align the operational needs with business strategies based on your analysis. Include the following in your proposal:
An analysis of the company based on Porter’s Five Forces
An analysis on the effectiveness of the leadership model the company is currently using
Consider the current leadership style or styles in place at the company.
Determine the effectiveness of the leadership style/s and whether an alternative style/s would be more impactful.
Assess how to determine effective leadership. What makes a leader effective or ineffective?
Consider sources of managerial power when leaders are effective.
Recommendation for the following actions:
Leadership model changes
2- to 3- actions needed to align operational needs with business strategies identified in Week 1

 

Sample Solution

According to career coach Kathleen Brady, “true leadership is the ability to influence individuals to create a better result for an organization or group.” 1 Employee satisfaction, a strong bottom line, an innovative workplace culture, positive social change, and other factors are just a few examples of how a leader’s influence can be seen at work. For instance, evidence reveals that managers have an influence on 70% of workforce engagement, which is measured as the degree of dedication and connection that employee has with their place of employment. The executive suite does not always have the best leadership chances. Every level of an organization has leaders and managers, from the employees who supervise large worldwide initiatives to those who handle modest departmental tasks. 3 It’s
+-

ts went to space, they simply didn’t arrive on the moon. All things being equal, Armstrong and Aldrin burned through 8 days simply circling the Earth, holding up to return. Trick scholars accept it is in fact difficult to arrive on the moon, and they say for this reason no other nation has attempted it. Most connivance scholars accept that the moon arrival was really created and recorded in the notorious US Air Force office, Area 51. They say that the arrangement of the lunar landing is as yet remaining in the office, which is the reason Area 51 is so vigorously protected. The proof of this? Trick scholars highlight Russian satellite pictures that show cavities that seem to be those on the moon, and a plane shelter that could be utilized as a sound stage.

Close to the above asserts, the principal proof trick scholars mostly depend on irregularities for their proof. They start with the absence of motor commotion in the arrival recordings. Predominant in the take-off recordings, the motor and rockets can’t be plainly heard during the arrival and scheme scholars say you wouldn’t really have the option to hear the space explorers over the motor thunder. They additionally say that the arrival vehicle, the “Hawk” arrived very effectively on the moon. They highlight Armstrong’s test in the desert that was endeavored a couple of months before the arrival. The test was a finished debacle and brought about Armstrong shooting as the vehicle crashed and detonated. Whenever an arrival vehicle was seen was the impeccable arriving on the moon’s surface. As the vehicle arrived on a superficial level that Armstrong depicts “practically like a powder,” scheme scholars say there ought to have been an impact hole made by the blasters in the arrival vehicle. However, in addition to the fact that there is no impact hole found in any photographs or recordings from Armstrong’s arrival, there are no photographs or recordings of a shoot pit in any of the six Apollo missions. Scheme scholars likewise express that as the vehicle makes this hole, (which it didn’t however it ought to have) moon residue ought to have been lifted by the vehicle which ought to then fall onto the feet of the vehicle. However, there is no residue on the feet in the photographs from the arrival. Scheme scholar and self-guaranteed moon landing examiner Bill Kaysing, who recently filled in as a specialist fo

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.