Analyse a learner’s language samples to identify and evaluate language development with reference to key theories
Language analysis is a systematic approach to understanding the development of a learner’s language over time. It involves examining samples of language production and comparing them against key theories in order to identify strengths and weaknesses in the learner’s language abilities. In doing so, areas for improvement can be identified and targeted for instruction.
One theory that is often used when analyzing language samples is Universal Grammar (UG), which states that all languages have certain common features or “rules” that make communication possible (Chomsky, 1957). By analyzing the grammar structures used by learners, it can be determined whether or not they have successfully acquired these rules. For example, if a learner uses incorrect verb tense forms consistently throughout their sample then it may indicate an underdeveloped understanding of UG rules related to verb tense formation.
Another key theory used in language analysis is Pragmatics -the study of how context influences meaning (Levinson, 1983). When evaluating samples of spoken interaction between individuals, it can be seen whether learners accurately interpret contextual cues such as tone of voice and body language; an indication that they are able to use pragmatics appropriately. Additionally, looking at how students initiate conversations and react to those around them can provide insight into their social communicative abilities which are important for successful interactions with others (Furrow et al., 1996).
To summarize, through careful analysis of learners’ language samples using theories such as UG and Pragmatics, areas where further instruction may be beneficial will become apparent; aiding teachers in creating effective lesson plans tailored towards a student’s individual linguistic needs.
understudies. Given the expected worth of such figures propelling scholastic achievement and hence impacting results like maintenance, wearing down, and graduation rates, research is justified as it might give understanding into non-mental techniques that could be of possible benefit to this populace (Lamm, 2000) . Part I: INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY Introduction The country is encountering a basic lack of medical care suppliers, a deficiency that is supposed to increment in the following five years, similarly as the biggest populace in our country’s set of experiences arrives at the age when expanded clinical consideration is essential (Pike, 2002). Staffing of emergency clinics, centers, and nursing homes is more basic than any time in recent memory as the enormous quantities of ‘people born after WW2’s start to understand the requirement for more continuous clinical mediation and long haul care. Interest in turning into a medical caretaker has disappeared as of late, presumably because of the historical bac