LGBTQ+ status

 

 

Describe the roles of culture and bias in interpreting and conveying information
Scenario
You are working in one of the following civilian roles located in your hometown or work area, or in a nearby metropolitan area. You have recently been asked to gather a group of community members and certain sworn officials to offer a diversity training to. The training presentation will include common terminology and stereotypes, and the community members will have to identify their implicit biases.

First, select one association-sworn official from the Criminal Justice Professional Associations PDF document. Next, select one of the following civilian roles:

Paralegal
Court Clerk
Victim Advocate
Nonprofit Administrator
Eligibility Specialist
Directions
Training
After you have chosen your civilian role and your audience of specific sets of sworn officials, follow the directions below to complete your assignment:

Describe how culture impacts communications from criminal justice professionals, using appropriate terminology. You may include any videos or supplemental theories you think may be relevant.
Include key terminology related to cultural awareness, including:
Terms related to classifications of cultures (e.g., contraculture)
The difference between race and ethnicity
The difference between discrimination and prejudice
Provide at least one example of each type—speaking and listening—when there is miscommunication.
Explain how cultural stereotypes can negatively influence decision making in criminal justice settings. Include the following:
Three examples of stereotypes common to these defined groups and how they can be harmful when generalized and lead to poor decision making:
Race
Ethnicity
Language ability
Citizenship
Religion
Explain how diversity stereotypes can negatively influence decision making in criminal justice settings. Include the following:
Five examples of stereotypes common to these defined groups and how they can be harmful when generalized and lead to poor decision making:
Socioeconomic status (SES)
Gender
LGBTQ+ status
Age
Disability (including mental disabilities)
A brief explanation of the history behind stereotyping one of these five diverse communities in the United States
Explain how personal bias may influence speaking and listening.
Explain the relationship between ethnocentrism and communication issues among criminal justice professionals and the public.
Distinguish implicit from explicit bias.

Sample Solution

espite efforts by psychologists, political scientists, and sociologists, the only consensus reached regarding the traditional terrorist profile is that a single terrorist profile cannot be determined. In most cases, the personality traits of terrorists are entirely invariable from a non-terrorist, making it incredibly challenging to profile and distinguish a terrorist from any other individual in most settings (Hudson, 1999). Despite the lack of a defined profile, Jerrold M. Post—a professor at George Washington University—believes the generational transmission of extremist beliefs may offer some increased insight (Kershaw, 2010). This generational transmission, Post says, begins at an early age and includes feelings of victimization and alienation, belief that the end will justify the means in a moral sense, fear of religious or nationalist group extinction, and the concept that violence is the only solution (Kershaw, 2010). One of many, this theory offers potential insight into what drives an individual to become a terrorist. The lack of a standard terrorist profile has drawn even further interest by psychologists, political scientists, government officials/agencies, and sociologists in understanding why someone becomes a terrorist. The various psychological and sociological theories may offer some understanding, which will be explored throughout this paper.

The Choice for Terrorism

Psychologists and sociologists within their respective disciplines have focused on understanding the consistent, underlying social perpetrators of terrorism for years (Davis and Cragin, 2009). Despite comparing all these motivators, most believe the primary cause of terrorism is a result of the choice by an individual to engage in terrorist acts (Daddio, Lecture 2, 2018). According to Martha Crenshaw—a professor of political science at Stanford University—terrorism is a logical choice and terrorist groups make calculated decisions prior to, and even while, engaging in terrorist acts (Roser et al., 2018). James Forest—a professor at the University of Massachusetts Lowell—also supports the notion that individual choice is a key part of a terrorist’s development. An arguable contributor to this choice is the social interaction with individuals who have radical ideas as this often provides the first introduction to terrorism (Daddio, Lecture 2, 2018). Osama bin Laden is a prime example of this, as his original introduction to the Muslim Brotherhood was the result of his interaction with his school teachers. Soon, Osama bin Laden began to emulate the behavior of his teachers, justifying the decision and rationale to engage in terrorism (Daddio, Lecture 2, 2018). Beyond the effects of

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.