Life Experiences

 

 

 

Provide a better understanding of the various theoretical ideologies that influence human behavior, by applying them appropriately in a personal context. It will also provide clarification into contemporary issues and social problems occurring in the world around us. Further, it will provide the foundation for future discussions and assignments that focus on prevention or solutions.

Write about your life experiences relative to the theories we have been studying. Think about and discuss the many people, places, things and experiences that have influenced you along the way and that have shaped you into who you are today.

First, before you begin to write the essay, think about and brainstorm a list of all of the possible reasons why you are the person that you have become.

Biologically (Race, age, gender, physique, agility, physical attractiveness, height, weight, health, medical history, birth order and childhood experiences)

Psychologically (Intelligence, personality, emotions, aptitudes and interests, strengths and weaknesses)

Socially:
• Ethnicity; family values, holidays and traditions, religious practices, culture, relationships with extended family members. If you were born or grew up in a different culture what were some of the cultural differences? What was it like to transition here? How do the values, expectations, traditions vary? How did your move here affect you? Social status? economic status?
• Region you grew up in; urban, rural, or suburban upbringing,
• School experiences: friendships, academics, sports, hobbies, activities
• Relationships: to other society members, significant others, children. How did these relationships influence decisions you have made?

Begin with an introduction- an overview of who you are. What effects have each of the above factors had on your life chances, your attitudes, your career choices, your values, your criminal involvement or lack of criminal involvement, your victimization? Which specific factors have been most important in influencing your life? Why? Who were your role models? How did they help you? Why were they significant? How do you handle success? How do you handle diversity? What are your education goals? What are your career goals?

Then write your paper. Be sure to answer all of the above in a thoughtful essay format (no bullets or numbers) that is logical and flows, and describes you as fully as possible. Using understanding of human development, and the three major schools of thought; biological, sociological, and psychological, integrate the theories into your essay and make the connections from the theory to your life experiences and life choices. Use your analysis to help you articulate which school(s) of thought explain you best. Why did other schools not “work for you?” Are there parts of all of the theoretical groups that explain you best? Be sure to provide sufficient discussion, examples and applications of the theoretical concepts. It is not enough to give me the summary of your life, you need to demonstrate that you understand and can apply the theoretical concepts to the things that have influenced who you have become today (see attached rubric for this assignment.

Sample Introductory Paragraph
When reflecting back on the many years of my existence, I realize that there have been so many people who have influenced and guided me. There have also been numerous experiences from which I have learned, and shaped my beliefs and values. These experiences are analogous to the three theoretical schools of thought we are studying.

 

 

 

Sample Solution

can issue a declaration of incompatibility. Although s.4 cannot declare the incompatible legislation ‘unlawful’, this high-profile and very rare pronouncement usually leads to legislative amendments by Parliament.

Notably, ever since the Solange I judgement in 1974, the German FCC has also shown unreserved defiance to EU legislative supremacy by exercising review as a means of maintaining its constitutional focus on human rights: the Brunner case set an ex-ante control standard for the integrative process with absolute limits, whilst the CC has placed restrictions on the common policy agenda, thus, also limiting future proposals.

As a point of principle, Lord Reid explained in HS2, that the impact of EU law depends on the norms of the UK legal system – if the law in question should enjoy a particular level of constitutional fundamental as in Germany, the UKSC would not be bound by the sovereignty of EU law to the same extent. Only a small number of explicit human rights and liberties are found in the French Code Napoleon preamble, instead affording greater degree of creativity to CC judges to establish higher law precedent as a means of overcoming EU primacy.

The effects of this modus operandi are also starting to be witnessed in UKSC jurisprudence following the ‘creative interpretation’ of Thoburn and HS2, ensuring effect is given to enshrined human rights. According to Ekins, the enforcement of these principles by the UKSC is indicative of a departure from its traditional role as the highest ordinary court, to that of a constitutional norm protector, reflective of the CC definition.

The former Lord Chancellor, Michael Gove, supports this approach of ex-ante review as this would expand legislative bounders and at the same time preserve the principle of parliamentary sovereignty.

In addition, there has been considerable support for a British Bill of Rights to defend UK civil rights broader European paradigms, evidenced by the 2013 Judicial Review and Transforming Legal Aid Proposals which highlight the profound and constitutionally significant inability of individuals, charities and NGOs to defend their rights in the UK court system. Chief Justice, Lord Neuberger, commented on this lack of access to rights in HS2: “It is no good granting people rights if they cannot (…) get effective enforcement procedures in respect of any judgement based on those rights”.

4) Summary

If the UK decides to adopt certain aspects of CCs in continental Europe, there are key constitutional aspects that pose a conflict of interest and would be very difficult to reconcile; to name just two:

Firstly, any proposal for ‘higher’ constitutional law will inevitably raise questions about the relationship between UK law and the sovereignty of the UK Parliament; It is no coincidence that most CCs are situated in civil law jurisdictions where constitutional legislation is explicitly distinguished from ordinary legislation – in Germany, the fundamental constitutional principles are clearly defined in Art 1, 20 and 79 of the Grundgesetz, a code dedicated to constitutional issues.

Secondly, any proposals to replace the HRA with a UK Bill of Rights would raise fundamental questions about the relationship between UK and EU law and consequently the relationship betwee

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.