Life Span Interview

 

Ray’s case has provided you with direct observation of a client’s history and life experiences. In the absence of this direct observation, social workers turn to assessment and interview techniques to gather essential facts about a client’s life span. Interviewing is an important social work skill—and one that requires more than simply reading a set of prescribed questions. A social worker must also demonstrate professional communication, both verbally and nonverbally, ask appropriate follow-up questions, and take notes at the same time.

For this Assignment, you practice interviewing an older adult about life events, experiences, and feelings that have shaped them. You then transform your interview notes into a narrative—that is, a life story—of the individual ­you interviewed. You interweave within this narrative an analysis of the life story by integrating person and the environment concepts and theories drawn from HBSE I and II.

To Prepare:

If you have not already done so, interview an older adult (age 65 or older) about their life story, using the Life Span Interview document in the Learning Resources. Take notes as you conduct the interview.
Review your notes and begin to interpret the older adult’s life story through the lens of human behavior and the social environment.
By 02/04/2022

Submit a 4 to 5-page paper in which you provide a narrative analysis of the Life Span Interview you completed. The paper should:

Provide a chronological history of the individual’s major life experiences.
Identify specific biological, psychological, and sociological influences that shaped the individual’s experience.
Analyze the individual’s experiences by applying theory and concepts learned throughout both HBSE courses.
Be sure to include the ways in which power, privilege, and oppression shaped their experience (e.g., race and ethnicity, gender, religion, ability, sexual orientation, etc.).
Provide your reflection of the experience, both in interviewing the individual and analyzing their narrative.
Explain what you learned and how you will apply this learning to future social work practice.

Sample Solution

urthly, Vittola inquiries upon whose authority can request a revelation of war, where he infers any republic can do battle, yet more critically, “the ruler” where he has “the regular request” as per Augustine, and all authority is given to him. This is additionally upheld by Aristotle’s Politics ((1996), Page 28): ‘a lord is the normal prevalent of his subjects.’ However, he truly does later accentuate to place all confidence in the sovereign is off-base and has results; an exhaustive assessment of the reason for war is expected alongside the readiness to arrange rival party (Begby et al (2006b), Page 312& 318). This is upheld by the activities of Hitler are considered shamefully. Likewise, in this day and age, wars are not generally battled simply by states yet additionally non-state entertainers like Al-Queda and ISIS, showing Vittola’s regularizing guarantee on power is obsolete. This is additionally upheld by Frowe’s case that the pioneer needs to address individuals’ inclinations, under authentic power, which joins on to the fourth condition: Public affirmation of war. Concurred with many, there should be an authority declaration on a presentation of war (Frowe (2011), Page 59-60&63).

At long last, the most dubious condition is that wars ought to have a sensible likelihood of coming out on top. As Vittola emphasized, the point of war is to lay out harmony and security; getting the public great. On the off chance that this can’t be accomplished, Frowe contends it would be smarter to give up to the adversary. This can be supported in light of the fact that the expenses of war would have been greater (Frowe (2011), Page 56-7).

Subsequently, jus promotion bellum involves a few conditions yet above all: worthwhile motivation and proportionality. This gives individuals an aide whether or not it’s legitimate to enter a conflict. Nonetheless, this is just one piece of the hypothesis of the simply war. By the by, it very well may be seen over that jus advertisement bellum can be bantered all through, showing that there is no authoritative hypothesis of a simply battle, as it is normatively hypothesized.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.