Listening Log Journals

 

You will submit two (2) Listening Log Journals from the above listed units. Please choose
one (1) piece from two of the eight (8) listed artistic eras or categories above.
Both submissions should include the following information for each unit, era or genre
studied in this class.

Please use the terms and definitions highlighted in this course. There is a glossary and brief
reminder sheet at the end of this document. Dissect the piece that you are analyzing and use the
musical elements (a basic simple part of something) to make statements regarding the piece.

Based on what you hear and applying references from the course content, describe the likely social
context of this music, and support your argument (Examples: this sounds like it may be used in religious
ritual because it is slow and quiet, and thus might encourage contemplation).

Make a personal connection with the music.
What does the music make you feel?
What does the music remind you of?
How does this music compare to music the music that you listen to? Are there similarities? What are the
differences?

As this is a journal, you are expected to include your own thoughts and opinions about the music,
specifically around how the music relates to your own musical tastes and experiences. Rather than
direct statements about whether you like or dislike the music, try to contextualize it within your own
frame of musical reference and provide supporting evidence for why the examples appeal to you or not.

Expectations – You are strongly encouraged to take notes to write your journal entries during the week
or so after we have discussed the region/music in class. Your analysis will be the most thoughtful and
insightful when the relevant concepts and terms are current in your study.

Sample Solution

 

A Photograph of Cartier-Bresson

GuidesorSubmit my paper for examination

Photography has without a doubt gotten one of the most amazing and significant visual crafts of the twentieth century, and influenced different parts of craftsmanship fundamentally. This is, maybe, one of those expressions that are close to nothing or not influenced by mechanical advancement, and it is just the ability and expertise of a craftsman that issues. There lived numerous bosses of photography, yet there was one whose works portrayed the whole twentieth century with its logical inconsistencies and shows as completely as no one else figured out how to. The name of this craftsman was <b>Henri Cartier-Bresson, the author of the well known Magnum organization, and one of the most remarkable picture takers everything being equal.

elucidating article sampleAmong Henri Cartier-Bresson’s works, I particularly appreciate the one titled “Political Meeting” made in Paris in 1953. It is a high contrast picture that delineates an enormous horde of individuals, situated in a storage or assembling office, and an individual who is going to hold a discourse before them (or as of now is). The structure of the photograph is worked so that the speaker’s desolate outline is by all accounts differentiated by the boundless horde of individuals who assembled at the gathering. This impression is implemented by the lines of the structure’s roof, which control the watcher’s sight into the profundity of the image, to a minor spot of the office’s exit. The entire picture is supported in shades of dim of different forces; the darkest and the most splendid spots are the speaker’s figure and the office’s windows individually.

The photo has a compelling passionate charge that is effectively seen from the principal snapshots of taking a gander at it. The individuals appear to be trusting that the speaker will offer them an answer for a troublesome issue. Maybe it is a worker’s organization rally, or a strike. The speaker, in his turn, is by all accounts to some degree confounded, and even overpowered by the group. It appears that H. Cartier-Bresson has delineated a snapshot of ungainly quietness, when the desires for a great many individuals are routed to a solitary individual, who is befuddled and doesn’t have a clue what to state. This is an emotional vision, however, and the circumstance may have created in an alternate manner.

When all is said in done, the photo is a portrayal of the air that was set up in Europe after the Second World War. It was the hour of huge changes and social disturbances, work and freedom, expectations and troubles, and H. Cartier-Bresson has caught it all in only one photograph.

Pundits internationally esteem H. Cartier-Bresson’s photos as an exclusive expectation. He constantly figured out how to catch the pith of occasions or people he pointed his camera at. His photographs are pictures shot with polished methodology, however are increasingly similar to short stories, each with its own passionate charge and setting. Cartier-Bresson had once said it was life itself, not photography, that intrigued him the most. What’s more, this is the thing that can be effectively observed when taking a gander at any of his works.

workmanship article, paper about well known individual, exposition about existence

 

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.