Logistic Job-Norfolk Southern Railroad

 

While I am not currently serving in a logistics billet at my current unit, several of my previous assignments in the NY Army National Guard were logistics-related positions. My first official position dedicated to logistics was as the Squadron (Battalion) S-4 officer. This entailed logistics coordination responsibility for the cavalry reconnaissance squadron to which I was assigned. I was placed in this position primarily because the squadron commander was aware of my interest in logistics, and he provided me with this opportunity for development. The position was challenging due to my lack of prior logistics experience, as well as the fact that I was not on active duty status, which limited my access to secure military logistics systems and developing information throughout the month. Another big challenge was learning how to do the job, as most of my senior officers and peers were relatively unfamiliar with the duties and responsibilities, and my full-time NCO was extremely busy. Knowledge resources were challenging to get ahold of, and I’ll admit that I never felt up to speed, even after almost a year in that position. However, I did learn a great deal that helped prepare me for other logistics assignments.

My next assignment was as the Brigade Operations-Logistics Planner. Shortly after being assigned to this position, I attended 4 weeks of the Army Reserve Component Captain’s Career Course at Fort Lee, VA, where I completed a valuable crash course in Army and joint logistics operations.

A few months after completing this course, I received active duty orders to support NY’s COVID-19 response operations. My first position was as a strike team leader, involving logistics only in conjunction with other small unit leadership functions. Three months later I was reassigned to a headquarters element under the J-4 (logistics) shop to coordinate subsistence for National Guard operations in various locations across the state. I remained in this position for about a year and a half. There was no formal training for that specific position, but my first boss did a very good job of mentoring me through my responsibilities and making me aware of his expectations. Looking back, I’d say that after a week or two I was able to function without significant oversight from my boss. This position involved contacting and negotiating service agreements with local food vendors, coordinating payment for services, and working with National Guard leadership in the receiving units to ensure food services were flowing appropriately for each mission. This was my most recent logistics-related position in the military.

One thing I have learned about the logistics field (both military and civilian) is that it is very broad and entails many different skills and areas of expertise. In the S-4 and Operations-Logistics Planner positions that I mentioned above, I often felt overwhelmed with the broad knowledge that was expected of me. However, in the meal coordination role, the scope of responsibility was more limited, and it was easier to focus and develop myself in that role. The on-the-job training that I received in my military logistics positions has prepared me for the future by teaching me to start with limited focuses and work to expand them as I gain a wider amount of experience.

Has anyone in class previously found themselves in similar situations where the responsibilities/expectations are broad and vague? If so, what are some recommendations for navigating such challenges?

 

Yes, I have found myself in many situations where the responsibilities and expectations are broad and vague. One of the most difficult aspects of these types of environments is that it can be hard to know what you should prioritize or how far you should go in terms of taking initiative. My advice for navigating such challenges would be to try and break down the goals into smaller, more manageable chunks so as to not become overwhelmed by the scope of tasks at hand. This also allows one to better plan out their approach while having a clear understanding of what needs to be accomplished.

Furthermore it is important that one communicates effectively with their team or supervisor in order to ensure they understand both the expectations and timelines associated with any project. By communicating regularly this will prevent any misunderstandings and allow for more open dialogue which can help when making decisions about how best to proceed (Dubs & Farrenkopf 2004). Additionally, if there are certain areas where additional clarity is needed then it is beneficial to ask questions in order gain an understanding from those who do have prior experience or knowledge on particular topics.

Finally, if you find yourself feeling overwhelmed it might be beneficial to take a step back and look at some ways that could make your job easier such as automating tasks that don’t require much thought but still need completed on a regular basis (e.g utilizing task automation software). Taking steps like this can help streamline processes thus saving time while also allowing you focus on other pressing issues.

In conclusion, living up to broad expectations without much clarity can certainly present its own set of challenges however by breaking down goals into smaller manageable pieces, asking questions when necessary, and utilizing technology efficiently these obstacles can easily be overcome.

a majority of depictions, found in Chapter 1, demonstrating the way that self-protection can’t necessarily legitimize one’s activities. Significantly more hazardous, is the situation of self-protection in war, where two clashing perspectives are laid out: The Collectivists, an entirely different hypothesis and the Individualists, the continuation of the homegrown hypothesis of self-preservation (Frowe (2011), Page 9& 29-34). All the more significantly, Frowe invalidates Vittola’s view on retribution on the grounds that right off the bat it engages the punisher’s position, yet in addition the present world forestalls this activity between nations through lawful bodies like the UN, since we have modernized into a somewhat quiet society (Frowe (2011), Page 80-1). Above all, Frowe further disproves Vittola through his case that ‘right goal can’t be blamed so as to take up arms in light of expected wrong,’ proposing we can’t simply hurt another in light of the fact that they have accomplished something shameful. Different variables should be thought of, for instance, Proportionality. Thirdly, Vittola contends that war ought to be stayed away from (Begby et al (2006b), Page 332) and that we ought to continue conditions strategically. This is upheld by the “final retreat” position in Frowe, where war ought not be allowed except if all actions to look for tact comes up short (Frowe (2011), Page 62). This implies war ought not be announced until one party must choose the option to pronounce battle, to safeguard its region and freedoms, the point of war. In any case, we can likewise contend that the conflict can never be the final retreat, considering there is consistently a method for attempting to stay away from it, similar to approvals or pacification, showing Vittola’s hypothesis is defective. Fourthly, Vittola inquiries upon whose authority can request a formal statement of war, where he suggests any district can do battle, however more critically, “the sovereign” where he has “the regular request” as per Augustine, and all authority is given to him. This is additionally upheld by Aristotle’s Politics ((1996), Page 28): ‘a lord is the normal prevalent of his subjects.’ However, he truly does later stress to place all confidence in the ruler is off-base and has results; a careful assessment of the reason for war is expected alongside the readiness to arrange rival party (Begby et al (2006b), Page 312& 318). This is upheld by the activities of Hitler are considered unjustifiably. Additionally, in this day and age, wars are not generally battled simply by states yet in addition non-state entertainers like Al-Queda and ISIS, showing Vittola’s regulating guarantee on power is obsolete. This is additionally upheld by Frowe’s case that the pioneer needs to address individuals’ inclinations, under real power, which joins on to the fourth condition: Public statement of war. Concurred with many, there should be an authority declaration on a statement of war (Frowe (2011), Page 59-60&63).

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.