What are the major differences between the Modernization theories on global stratification and the World Systems/Dependency Theories on global inequalities?
Apply one of these theories to a current news story. Discuss how the theory helps to better understand the particular current event example.
Modernization vs. World Systems/Dependency Theories: Understanding Global Inequality
Modernization Theories:
World Systems/Dependency Theories:
Applying World Systems/Dependency Theory to a Current Event:
Example: The recent rise in global food insecurity due to the Russia-Ukraine war.
World Systems/Dependency Lens:
Understanding Through the Lens:
The World Systems/Dependency theory helps us understand how developing countries can become vulnerable to global events due to their dependence on developed nations. In this case, the war disrupts the established food trade network, disproportionately impacting developing countries that rely heavily on Ukrainian wheat imports. This reinforces the notion of unequal power dynamics within the global food system, where some nations have more control and are less susceptible to external shocks.
Modernization vs. World Systems/Dependency:
Modernization theories might suggest that developing countries need to improve their agricultural self-sufficiency to avoid dependence on imports. However, World Systems/Dependency theories argue that unequal trade practices and limited resources make self-sufficiency challenging for developing nations within the current global power structure.
Conclusion:
Both theories offer valuable perspectives on global inequality. Modernization theories highlight internal challenges that can hinder development. World Systems/Dependency theories emphasize the external factors that perpetuate inequality. By understanding both perspectives, we can gain a more nuanced understanding of global issues like food insecurity.