Major differences between the Modernization theories on global stratification and the World Systems/Dependency
What are the major differences between the Modernization theories on global stratification and the World Systems/Dependency Theories on global inequalities?
Apply one of these theories to a current news story. Discuss how the theory helps to better understand the particular current event example.
Modernization vs. World Systems/Dependency Theories: Understanding Global Inequality
Modernization Theories:
- Emphasis on Progress: Modernization theories view development as a linear progression from traditional societies to modern ones.
- Internal Obstacles: They attribute poverty and inequality to internal factors within developing nations, such as lack of education, technology, or cultural values.
- Western Model as Ideal: Modernization theories often promote Western models of development as the ideal path for progress.
- Global Power Structures: World Systems/Dependency theories emphasize the role of global power structures in creating and perpetuating inequality.
- Exploitation and Unequal Exchange: They argue that developed countries exploit developing countries through unequal trade practices and resource extraction.
- Core-Periphery Model: This model depicts a core of wealthy, developed nations exploiting a periphery of developing nations through unfair trade and investment practices.
- Global Food System Dependence: Many developing countries rely heavily on food imports, particularly from major wheat producers like Ukraine.
- Vulnerability to External Shocks: The war disrupts food production and exports, causing price hikes and shortages in import-dependent countries.
- Unequal Power Dynamics: Developed countries with diverse food sources are less affected, highlighting the vulnerability of developing nations in the global food system.