Making a Child Borderline-Secret Motivations of the Mother

 

Exlpore what, if any, secret movitations mothers have for creating children who are diagnosed with Borderline and Histrionic PD as adults. To be able to identify specific findings and ideas as to how this occurs and why. Is it on purpose, or just generational overflow.

 

 

 

Sample Solution

The motivations for mothers creating children who are diagnosed with Borderline or Histrionic Personality Disorders as adults is still largely unknown. A recent study did however, uncover some possible explanations. The study found that mothers of adult children with these personality disorders often possess qualities of taking on maternal roles which are extreme and overly controlling (Burns et al., 2018). This overbearing style of parenting may be a result of the mother’s own underlying emotional issues such as neglect, abandonment or trauma they experienced in childhood (Burns et al., 2018). This could potentially lead them to have an unconscious desire to control their children’s behaviors and emotions more than normal.

In addition, the study identified other less conscious reasons why a mother might create a child who develops either histrionic or borderline PD later in life. These include feelings of inadequacy, as well as a need for validation from others due to negative self-image associated with past experiences (Burns et al., 2018). It has also been suggested that generational factors may play a role; if a parent has difficulties managing relationships it can leave their child vulnerable to developing similar problems such as those seen in both border line and histrionic personality disorders (Tobin & Kienhuis 2012).

Therefore, while it is not possible to definitively say whether mothers create these conditions on purpose or whether there is an overflow from generationally inherited traits, research suggests that certain psychological motivations may be at play which influence this behavior.

regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating to take note of that while there is a limited ability to recall lumps of data, how much pieces in every one of those lumps can change broadly (Miller, 1956). Anyway it’s anything but a straightforward instance of having the memorable option huge pieces right away, somewhat that as each piece turns out to be more natural, it very well may be acclimatized into a lump, which is then recollected itself. Recoding is the interaction by which individual pieces are ‘recoded’ and allocated to lumps. Consequently the ends that can be drawn from Miller’s unique work is that, while there is an acknowledged breaking point to the quantity of pieces of data that can be put away in prompt (present moment) memory, how much data inside every one of those lumps can be very high, without unfavorably influencing the review of similar number

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.