Briefly define how a company used to manage projects before using prince 2 methodology for example, as a company we used to use agile methodology and after that we used prince 2 and define prince 2 and application of prince 2 principles and themes on the project and use the documents attached below such as risk register, issue register and quality register and after that critically evaluate how prince 2 methodology effected managing the project table of contents executive summary introduction current methodology comparison between agile & price 2 briefly general characteristic principles of prince 2 themes of prince 2 processors of prince 2 critical evaluation of how the application of prince 2 methodology affected the project 19 Resources are needed use the books attached
PRINCE2 (Projects In Controlled Environments) is a structured project management method that uses defined processes to map out activities within each stage of a project’s life cycle. It was developed by the UK government through an initiative called OGC (Office of Government Commerce). The PRINCE2 methodology provides a flexible framework which can be tailored to fit any type of project, regardless of its size or complexity. This means it can be applied across both public and private sectors with greater success than other methods like Agile or Waterfall.
The key principles behind PRINCE2 include: establishing clear roles between customers and suppliers; dividing up the work into manageable stages as needed; ensuring sufficient quality control measures are met; providing progress reporting mechanisms; identifying all potential risks early on in order to mitigate them more effectively; implementing cost control measures from start to finish; monitoring performance against plans regularly etcetera. These principles form the basis for seven themes: Business Case, Organization, Quality Assurance, Plans , Risk Management Change Control & Progress Reporting . All these elements taken together provide oversight over every aspect of a given project’s lifecycle – from initiation until completion – helping ensure smoother delivery and fewer delays & increased reliability/confidence in final outcome results.
Documents like risk registers , issue registers , quality registers etc also play important role in successful implementation ofprince 2 principle & themes , where it allows PMOs(project manager office )and team members track their risks & issues along with their outcomes & further plan required actions accordingly . Quality register provides platform to continual improvement plans while taking necessary actions ahead depending upon scope creep scenarios if any arises during execution phase . Thus helps organization deliver successful projects within planned timeline following expected budget limits.
was first kept in the Unified Realm in 2002 (UK Ranger service Commission, 2016). It taints the pony chestnut tree, Aesculus hippocastnum, causing leaf misfortune significantly sooner in its lifecycle than ought to occur (Grabenweger et al., 2005). A pony chestnut tree comprises of leaves comprised of five to seven handouts. One grown-up moth will rest up to 40 eggs for every flyer and every handout could have up to 300 eggs on it from various grown-ups (UK Ranger service Commission, 2016). It requires around a month for their improvement of the leaf excavator to be finished and during that time the hatchlings will consume within the pony chestnut flyer (UK Ranger service Commission, 2016) making mines. Albeit the leaf digger movement doesn’t appear to be disastrous to the pony chestnut tree, there is worry around the amount of an impact the nuisance has on the tree’s proliferation and how might affect the tree in the long haul (Percival et al., 2011). In spite of itself not being local to the Unified Realm, the pony chestnut tree has become piece of the rich biodiversity of the country. It is a staple across parks and sporting facilities and is stylishly significant (Percival et al., 2011).
The UK Ranger service Commission (2016) portrays the fundamental life pattern of Cameraria ohridella. In any case, minimal more is had some significant awareness of this species. Its reaction to expanded light contamination has absolutely not been reported. Concentrates on other leaf diggers and their reaction to light have been led however they report clashing discoveries. Connor (2006) concentrated on Cameraria hamadrydella, a leaf mining moth of white oak, Quercus alba, and found C. hamadrydella had no inclination among light and concealed leaves. In any case, there was a more prominent number of mines on concealed leaves contrasted with leaves in the light, suggesting that another element influences larval endurance (Connor, 2006). Potter (1992) concentrated on Phytomyza ilicicola, a leaf excavator of American holly and tracked down no distinction between leaf digger overflow on concealed and unshaded leaves. Collinge and Louda (1988) researched the action of Scaptomyza nigrita, a leaf mining fly, on harsh cress and viewed that as, regardless of the grown-up flies favoring plants in the sun, the wealth of mines was higher on leaves in counterfeit shade. Bultman and Faeth (1988) tracked down that leaf excavator movement because of light differs between leaf digger species. C. ohridella is a diurnal animal groups (Fischer et al., 2012) thus it would be normal to be attracted to trees in conditions with higher light forces.