Merton’s strain theory

1). Explain Merton’s strain theory and give an example of one of his five typical responses to social strain (do not choose conformity – that is not deviance, right?). Response should be rough 125 words (one full paragraph).

2). Explain what labeling theory is and why this is approach to understanding deviance fits within both the symbolic interactionist tradition and the conflict theory tradition. Be sure to begin by explaining these two theoretical frameworks. Response should be roughly 200 words (one to two paragraphs).

Rios reading, Chapter 4:

3). Which social institutions comprise the “web of punishment” that surround Black and Latino boys, according to the fieldwork Rios describes in Chapter 4? Give a specific example from his research on how one of these institutions punishes Black and Latino boys. Response should be roughly 250 words (two full paragraphs).

 

Sample Solution

Merton’s strain theory

Strain theory is a sociology and criminology theory developed in 1938 by Robert K. Merton. The theory states that society puts pressure on individuals to achieve socially accepted goals, such as the American dream, though they lack the means. Merton noted that the deviant response to strain was one of five responses he observed in society. He referred to such defiance as innovation while identifying the other responses to strain as conformity, ritualism, retreatism, and rebellion. Retreatism explains those who reject a society’s goals and refuse to try obtain them. These individuals are so dis-invested in these goals that they retreat from society. Labeling theory posits that self-identity and the behavior of individuals may be determined or influenced by terms used to describe or classify them. Thus, what is considered deviant is determined not so much by the behaviors themselves or the people who commit them, but by the reactions of others to these behaviors.

or the opposite becoming too engrossed with the responsibility they have been assigned. Ultimately, like with leadership ensuring teams are functioning properly is highly dependent on the situation, and becomes the leaders responsibility to analyse the situation and correctly organise groups to ensure success.

Motivation
Motivation is again a product of good leadership. Motivation is highly personal, and it is the leaders responsibility to understand what motivates each individual and implement policies to obtain maximum performance from a group. The importance of the leaders role in motivating individuals is highlighted in Herzberg’s Two Factor theory. The theory highlights factors that must be in place to avoid dissatisfaction, hygiene factors, and factors that promote satisfaction, motivation factors, shown in Figure 4 (Pettinger, 2007). Herzberg’s theory helps to decipher what motivates individuals, but does not advise on how to implement this to produce maximum productivity from an individual, this is achieved by using the theory in conjunction with other motivational theories such as goal setting theory.
Figure 4: Hygiene and Motivating Factors (Pettinger,, 2006)
Goal setting is not just an important part of motivation, they are essential for both teamwork and successful leadership, they provide indication on what must be achieved, how much effort they must devoted to achieve it and they act as the primary source of job motivation for individuals, therefore setting them accurately is essential (Pettinger 2007). Specific and clear goals are the most effective motivators, and will lead to optimum performance, therefore it becomes essential for a leader to understand what motivates each individual within a group (Pettinger, 2007). Motivation is highly personal, and can differ massively across a group, so the leader must adapt how they motivate to suit each individual

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.