Metaethical Theories

 

 

Now that you have learned about competing ethical theories, write a thread that compares and contrasts a Christian ethical theory with a competing ethical theory. Since we have already looked at ethical relativism in Discussion: Relativism vs Absolutism, you may choose from any metaethical theory covered in Moral Choices or Talking About Ethics except ethical relativism. That means you can choose from Virtue Ethics, Natural Law, Ethical Egoism, Utilitarianism, and Duty Ethics in contrast to a Christian ethical theory.

How does each system define “the good?” How does each claim to know “the good?”
What, if anything, do these systems have in common? What, if anything, are their key differences?
Which theory do you think is the stronger ethical theory? Defend your answer. This final question should take up the majority of your thread.
Be sure to carefully define your terms, articulate the strengths and weaknesses of each theory, and defend your position. You are expected to support your position with rational arguments, fitting examples, and expert sources. Any quotes or information used from sources other than yourself must be cited using footnotes in current Turabian format and will not count towards the total word count.

Sample Solution

Christian Ethical Theory

Christian ethical theory is based on the belief that God is the source of all goodness and that his will is the ultimate standard of morality. This theory holds that the good is that which is in accordance with God’s will, and the bad is that which is contrary to his will.

Christian ethical theory defines “the good” as obedience to God’s commands and living in accordance with his character. It claims to know “the good” through revelation, that is, through the Bible and the teachings of Jesus Christ.

The key strengths of Christian ethical theory are its emphasis on love, compassion, and forgiveness, and its grounding in a transcendent source of moral authority. However, some people find this theory to be too inflexible and dogmatic, and they argue that it does not take into account the complexities of human life.

Utilitarianism

Utilitarianism is a consequentialist ethical theory that defines “the good” as that which produces the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people. This theory holds that the right action is the one that produces the most good for the most people, regardless of the intentions of the actor.

Utilitarianism claims to know “the good” through reason and observation. It argues that we can use reason to determine which actions will produce the greatest happiness, and we can observe the consequences of our actions to see if they are actually producing the desired results.

The key strengths of utilitarianism are its focus on outcomes and its flexibility. This theory can be used to evaluate a wide range of actions, and it can be adapted to different cultural and ethical frameworks. However, some people find this theory to be too simplistic and that it does not take into account the rights and interests of individuals.

Similarities and Differences

Both Christian ethical theory and utilitarianism are concerned with the consequences of our actions. However, they have different views on what constitutes a good consequence. Christian ethical theory holds that the good consequence is obedience to God’s commands, while utilitarianism holds that the good consequence is happiness.

Another difference between these two theories is their view of the role of reason. Christian ethical theory believes that reason is important for understanding God’s commands, but it also believes that we need revelation to know what those commands are. Utilitarianism, on the other hand, believes that reason is the only way to know what is good.

Which Theory is Stronger?

I believe that Christian ethical theory is the stronger ethical theory. This is because it is more comprehensive and it takes into account more factors than utilitarianism. Christian ethical theory recognizes that there are things that are good even if they do not produce happiness, such as obedience to God’s commands and living in accordance with his character. Utilitarianism, on the other hand, can only judge actions based on their consequences, which can lead to morally questionable results.

For example, utilitarianism might say that it is permissible to lie if it produces the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people. However, Christian ethical theory would say that lying is always wrong, regardless of the consequences.

In addition, Christian ethical theory is more flexible than utilitarianism. It can be adapted to different cultural and ethical frameworks, while utilitarianism is more rigid. This makes Christian ethical theory more applicable to the real world.

Of course, no ethical theory is perfect. Christian ethical theory can be too rigid for some people, and it can be difficult to know what God’s commands are. However, I believe that it is the strongest ethical theory because it is more comprehensive and flexible than utilitarianism.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Christian ethical theory and utilitarianism are two different ethical theories with different strengths and weaknesses. I believe that Christian ethical theory is the stronger ethical theory because it is more comprehensive and flexible. However, I also believe that it is important to consider both theories when making ethical decisions.

 

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.