Choose one article from a primary scientific literature source that uses a microbe as a model organism/system and write a comprehensive summary of the study that answers the following questions:
Choose one article from a primary scientific literature source that uses a microbe as a model organism/system
NOTE: Many free articles may be obtained from http://www.pubmed.gov Links to an external site.or visit the WCU library.
Write a summary of the study that includes:
Why did the scientists perform the study (i.e., description of background)?
What was the hypothesis (or hypotheses) under investigation?
What were the major results and did they support or negate the hypothesis? Which key techniques were used to achieve these results?
Why are the results significant and do they point to further/future studies? In other words, why does this article matter and what should or could be done next?
Why did you choose this particular article to review? Was it interesting, informative, clearly written, or none of the above?
Compose your review in current APA Style and include:
To test this hypothesis, the authors used an experimental approach combining mathematical modeling and laboratory experiments on S. pneumoniae bacteria cultures from different sources. The mathematical model was used to simulate different environmental scenarios related to vertical transmission (from parent to offspring) and horizontal transfer (between individuals). These simulations were then compared with results obtained from lab experiments involving culturing various strains of S. pneumoniae over time under controlled conditions(Davies et al., 2020).
The results indicate that horizontal transfer is more frequent when host bacteria encounter hostile environments than it is during benign conditions; however both processes contribute significantly to genetic diversity within host populations over time resulting in enhanced adaptive capabilities within species such as S.pneumoniae(Davies et al., 2020). Furthermore, results also suggest that plasmids play a role in mediating gene exchange even when intracellular rather than extracellular pathogens are present which explains why some antibiotic resistance traits can rapidly spread across entire populations(Davies et al., 2020). Overall this study provides insight into how gene transfer via mobile elements such as plasmids has shaped our understanding of bacterial evolution at population level .
The hypothetical idea of hazard taking implies a few parts of equivocalness and startling quality. At its generally broad, risk taking alludes to the ability to be dangerous in unique conditions. Many creators stand out enough to be noticed to the course of hazard taking instead of to its ramifications. Allies of such view stress that the most common way of facing challenges begins by having a variety of activities to pick to settle an errand (Beebe, 1983). Bem (as refered to in Beebe, 1983) distinguishes the meaning of decisions and further considers risk taking a course of consistent selection of activities which can lead the student to a “more regrettable position” (in the same place). From one perspective, it tends to be contended that Bem’s negative perspective on language risk taking doesn’t distinguish the helpfulness or productivity of being bold in the study hall. Bem doesn’t represent risk taking as a potential positive specialist in the scholarly situation, yet he expresses a necessary piece of the gamble taking cycle: selection of blueprints. Most certainly, a daring individual needs to choose what is viewed as the most ideal decision right now of going with a choice. Accordingly, risk taking incorporates vulnerability of the result as well as of the activity or method chose to achieve an oral undertaking.
Different examinations on individual contrasts and second language securing have zeroed in on the results of chance taking as opposed to on the cycle concerning understudy achievement in talking errands. Kahneman, Slovic and Tversky for instance, recommend that facing challenges can have an on a very basic level unfortunate result since the student may be engaged with a misfortune or rout circumstance (as refered to in Gass and Selinker, 2008). Thusly, the idea of hazard taking will in general be corresponded with a negative condition that might forestall oral correspondence in a subsequent language. As per Dewaele and Furnham (1999) likewise conceivable daring people commit precision for speed in discourse creation, which could lead the student to deliver poor phonetic result. At the very least, elevated degrees of chance taking impact different regions, e.g., confidence, readiness to impart and certainty, which might set the student in a weak position. All in all, the more dangers a student pursues the more open doors he must be genuinely obliged.