Middle to low-income earners dine at Applebee’s

Why, based on the author’s research, do so many middle to low-income earners dine at Applebee’s when they can rarely or barely afford to, and their money would go four times as far if they bought food at a grocery store and made the same meals at home?

 

 

Sample Solution

In The Omnivore\\\’s Dilemma, Michael Pollan focuses on the appeal of Applebee\\\’s to middle to low-income earners. He notes that even though their money would go four times as far if they were to buy food from a grocery store and make the same meals at home, many people still choose to dine out at Applebee’s due its convenience factor.

Firstly, it is worth noting that eating out at restaurants like Applebee’s is often seen as an affordable luxury for these groups because it provides respite from everyday stresses (212). This makes sense in a society where leisure time has become increasingly difficult to come by due long hours spent working or commuting. Additionally dining out allows families and friends an opportunity to bond over shared experiences; this could be especially important for those with limited access resources such as single parents or elderly citizens who cannot cook large meals themselves.(213)

Furthermore, Applebee\’s also provides customers with a sense of familiarity which can be comforting in uncertain times. With standardized menus across all its locations there is always something familiar that people can connect with whether it’s the taste of the food or atmosphere provided by restaurant itself (209). Furthermore since pricing strategies are used strategically so that they appear more attractive than competitors prices, customers feel like they are getting value for money when dining there (210).

Therefore, through providing convenience, affordability and familiarity combined with good customer service,Applebee\´s have been able establish themselves as one of America\´s most popular casual dining chains with patrons from all walks life.(211)

Transient memory is the memory for a boost that goes on for a brief time (Carlson, 2001). In reasonable terms visual transient memory is frequently utilized for a relative reason when one can’t thoroughly search in two spots immediately however wish to look at least two prospects. Tuholski and partners allude to momentary memory similar to the attendant handling and stockpiling of data (Tuholski, Engle, and Baylis, 2001).

They additionally feature the way that mental capacity can frequently be antagonistically impacted by working memory limit. It means quite a bit to be sure about the typical limit of momentary memory as, without a legitimate comprehension of the flawless cerebrum’s working it is challenging to evaluate whether an individual has a shortage in capacity (Parkin, 1996).

 

This survey frames George Miller’s verifiable perspective on transient memory limit and how it tends to be impacted, prior to bringing the examination state-of-the-art and outlining a determination of approaches to estimating momentary memory limit. The verifiable perspective on momentary memory limit

 

Length of outright judgment

The range of outright judgment is characterized as the breaking point to the precision with which one can distinguish the greatness of a unidimensional boost variable (Miller, 1956), with this cutoff or length generally being around 7 + 2. Mill operator refers to Hayes memory length try as proof for his restricting range. In this members needed to review data read resoundingly to them and results obviously showed that there was a typical maximum restriction of 9 when double things were utilized.

This was regardless of the consistent data speculation, which has proposed that the range ought to be long if each introduced thing contained little data (Miller, 1956). The end from Hayes and Pollack’s tests (see figure 1) was that how much data sent expansions in a straight design alongside how much data per unit input (Miller, 1956). Figure 1. Estimations of memory for data wellsprings of various sorts and bit remainders, contrasted with anticipated results for steady data. Results from Hayes (left) and Pollack (right) refered to by (Miller, 1956)

 

Pieces and lumps

Mill operator alludes to a ‘digit’ of data as need might have arisen ‘to settle on a choice between two similarly probable other options’. In this manner a basic either or choice requires the slightest bit of data; with more expected for additional complicated choices, along a twofold pathway (Miller, 1956). Decimal digits are worth 3.3 pieces each, implying that a 7-digit telephone number (what is handily recollected) would include 23 pieces of data. Anyway an evident inconsistency to this is the way that, assuming an English word is worth around 10 pieces and just 23 pieces could be recollected then just 2-3 words could be recalled at any one time, clearly mistaken. The restricting range can all the more likely be figured out concerning the absorption of pieces into lumps.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.