Minor League Salaries

 

Step 1: Problem definition. What is the major challenge, problem, opportunity, or decision that has to be made? If there is more than one problem, choose the most important one. Often when solving the key problem, other issues will surface and be addressed. The problem statement may be framed as a question; for example, How can brand X improve market share among millennials in Canada?

Step 2: Alternatives. Identify in detail the strategic alternatives to address the problem; you need to identify at least two alternatives. Alternatives should be mutually exclusive, realistic, creative, and feasible given the constraints of the situation. Doing nothing or delaying the decision to a later date are not considered acceptable alternatives.

Step 3: Criteria. What are the key decision criteria that will guide decision-making? In a statistics course, for example, these might include what types of variables and statistics/graphs you need to make an informed decision. Students must discuss their rationale for selecting the decision criteria and the weights and importance for each factor.

Step 4: Analysis. Provide an in-depth analysis of each alternative based on the criteria chosen in step three. The pros and cons of the two choices as well as the short- and long-term implications of each may be evaluated. Here, you need to use at least 2 charts or graphs in your analysis. If you choose to use a graph that you did not create, then you need to make sure you cite the reference.

Step 5: Decision. Recommend one of the alternatives. Explain why the recommendation made is the best fit for the criteria.

Step 6: Implementation plan. Sound business decisions may fail due to poor execution. To enhance the likeliness of a successful project outcome, you need to describe the key steps (activities) to implement the recommendation

 

 

Sample Solution

uch as them being discharged to test their obdurate behavior towards the participants. The psychiatrists were not able to reliably distinguish normal people from those with an illness. A diagnostic method that makes any such errors cannot be considered valid or reliable. Collaboration was used greatly in this study as all eight participants worked together throughout the experiment. Without collaboration, this experiment would not have been completed accurately and properly as each and every step requires meticulous thinking. Also, the group was needed to gain proper admittance into the psychiatric ward for this rare situation. The production of knowledge in this study in the human sciences was a collaborative task and not solely the product of an individual.

The natural sciences is another area of knowledge in which production of knowledge can be seen as a collaborative task. The natural sciences is a branch of science that relates directly to the physical world including subjects such as physics, biology, chemistry, geology, and more. Research studies that show collaboration with production of knowledge are also conducted in this field. A biological study was conducted at Johns Hopkins School of Medicine about colorectal cancer. Dr. Subroto B. Chatterjee worked with colleagues to identify a protein, beta-1,4-galactosyltransferase-V, involved in the proliferation, rapid increase, of cells and development of new blood vessels could serve as biomarkers for early detection of colorectal cancer. The protein increased greatly in colorectal cancer tumor cells in comparison to normal human tissue. For further collaboration, he assigned groups of researchers to the same area of study to have multiple trials and perspectives on results. After observation of growth and an increase in activity, Dr. Chatterjee and other scientists began testing by inhibiting the protein and finding that the byproducts halted colorectal cancer cell proliferation. To conduct further research, Chatterjee collaborated with students and scientists from Johns Hopkins; they found elevated gene expressions in relation to colorectal cancer. They also used a previous study from 2013 in order to supplement their current research. This previous study was from Chatterjee’s previous group to show daily treatment with an inhibitor showing a reduction in the protein beta-1,4-galactosyltransferase-V. With this research, there was sufficient evidence to demonstrate blockage of the cycle of cell proliferation. Further collaboration between Dr. Chatterjee, Dr. Hou, Dr. Bandaru, Dr. Mannan and Dr. Sharma from Johns Hopkins School of Medicine and Dr. Pezhouh from Northwestern University’s Feinberg School of Medicine was shown in the publication of the study. Without the collaboration of the scientists, this study would not have been completed as there are many steps and complications throughout the experiment. There was also the collaboration of information from multiple groups in order to reach a conclusion. The publication had many authors as well. Because so many people worked together in order to produce this knowledge, it can be said that knowledge production

This question has been answered.

Get Answer