Miranda v. Arizona

at
Categories
Tags

A. Pick a controversial court case (Miranda v. Arizona)
B. Write at least a five (5) page paper describing the controversy.
SECTIONS OF PAPER TO INCLUDE:
1. Describe the parties involved.
2. Describe the involvement of the courts.
3. Describe the competing views? (including strengths and weaknesses of both positions)
4. Describe what is at stake for each side?
5. Describe if you agree with the outcome or what you believe should be the outcome and why?

Sample Solution

Miranda v. Arizona

Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 43 (196), was a landmark decision of the U.S Supreme Court in which the court ruled that the Fifth Amendment to the U.S constitution restricts prosecutors from using a person`s statement made in response to interrogation in police custody as evidence at their trial unless they can show that the person was informed of the right to consult with an attorney before and during questioning, and of the right against self-incrimination before police questioning, and that the defendant not only understood these rights, but voluntarily waived them. The case began with the 1963 arrest of Phoenix resident Ernesto Miranda, who was charged with rape, kidnapping, and robbery. Miranda was not informed of his rights prior to the police interrogation. Miranda remains good law today.

studying poetry, a misconception that can be rebutted is the idea that poetry finds itself focusing purely on the ‘pretty things’; completely voiding the struggles and lacking the connection to the world around us. Contrary to common misconception, poetry has the capability to use the ‘pretty things’ as a vice to further expand on deeper feelings in which humans struggle to even recognize in a striking way. Through further examination, one can come to the conclusion that poetry is one of the highest forms of expression – providing a beautiful cloak over the deepest thoughts lingering within the human mind in an unconventional but effective way. The importance of poetry lies beyond the surface, as one can be completely blind to this idea, making them unable to look beyond the words in the poem from a humanistic perspective. By examining works such as William Shakespeare’s Sonnets, Ben Jonson’s 1616 folio, and John Keats’ Ode to Autumn – one can further examine the author’s connection to deepest human thought through the use of beautiful and altruistic poetry.

To begin, William Shakespeare is known to be one of the most influential figures in Western literature through both his poetic works and plays in which he produced throughout the 15th and early 16th centuries. Shakespeare’s popularity is held high in standards due to his ability to convey emotions such as love, loss, guilt, and revenge as well as the psychological standpoint of the human mind with extraordinary use of the verbal facility to convey his innermost thoughts. In his Sonnets, Shakespeare’s chronic use of motifs is heavily centralized as well as his desire and will to convey the cyclical and poignant beauty of the natural world. It is through this centralization that one can recognize Shakespeare’s deep connection to human thought by use of paradoxes to convey both love and the unsureness of human emotion. In Sonnet 138, Shakespeare highlights the faults in love and the misconstrued idea behind truth, trust, and lies. When looking deeper into the poem, one can grasp the hardships between truth and flatte

This question has been answered.

Get Answer