Contrasts Between Conventional and Alternative Medicine GuidesorSubmit my paper for investigation AlternativeDoctorThe progress of science is generally accepted to have improved the nature of numerous procedures, items, and administrations. Be that as it may, in specific circles of life, customary strategies are as yet being utilized; medication is a splendid case of the concurrence of two antipodal methodologies. Alongside ordinarily perceived regular medication dependent on science and innovation, there likewise exists elective medication, which once in a while incorporates rehearses created a large number of years back. The predominance of every one of these sorts of medication have a long-standing history, as every one of them have demonstrated its adequacy; thusly, understanding their favorable circumstances and downsides is urgent for framing one's own perspective. The main contrast between these two frameworks is their way to deal with analysis. Traditional medication centers around the components that cause sicknesses and helping their manifestations; each variation from the norm is viewed as a free proviso, separate from the character of an individual and their condition. In contrast to its partner, elective medication considers a to be as a harmony of interrelations between a body and its condition; in this way, an ailment is believed to be brought about by a lopsidedness between them. At the end of the day, elective medication centers preferably around purging the whole framework over on restoring its specific components (Buzzle).

Sample Solution

Recently, I observed an interaction between two colleagues in the office that resulted in a miscommunication. The situation began when one of them asked for help on a project and was met with what seemed to be disinterest from the other colleague who responded with short sentences and minimal eye contact. This nonverbal behavior did not seem congruent with their verbal response as it gave off a feeling of indifference or lack of enthusiasm for helping. When analyzing this situation further, there were several potential factors that may have affected communication between these two individuals. For instance, generational differences could have been at play here due to the age gap between them which may have caused difficulty finding common ground while discussing the project (Hosoi et al., 2020). Additionally, since both employees come from different cultural backgrounds they likely held different values and beliefs which could lead to misunderstandings when communicating (Bhattacharyya & Piekkari 2019). Furthermore, language barriers may also be present here given that English is their second language which can limit understanding even when using simple phrases with clear meanings (Zhang et al., 2017). Lastly, this particular environment in the workplace presented additional challenges due to its open workspace design where conversations are easily heard by those around thus potentially making either employee feel uncomfortable speaking openly about certain topics (Schnell & Schnell-Tschudin 2020). In conclusion, it is important to recognize how multiple variables such as gender roles, generational gaps, cultural differences etc can affect interactions resulting in miscommunications if left unresolved. While some of these elements cannot be controlled easily within business settings managers should be aware of them so they are able address any issues arising from these types of situations effectively.