Modern, globalized world

 

Present research relating the critical thinker to the modern, globalized world. In this assignment, you need to address the items below in separate sections with new headings for each.

Identify the global societal problem within the introductory paragraph.
Conclude with a thesis statement that states your proposed solutions to the problem. (For guidance on how to construct a good introduction paragraph, please review the Introductions & Conclusions Links to an external site. from the University of Arizona Global Campus Writing Center Links to an external site..)
Describe background information on how that problem developed or came into existence.
Show why this is a societal problem.
Provide perspectives from multiple disciplines or populations so that you fully represent what different parts of society have to say about this issue.
Construct an argument supporting your proposed solutions, considering multiple disciplines or populations so that your solution shows that multiple parts of society will benefit from this solution.
Provide evidence from multiple scholarly sources as evidence that your proposed solution is viable.
Interpret statistical data from at least three peer-reviewed scholarly sources within your argument.
Discuss the validity, reliability, and any biases.
Identify the strengths and weaknesses of these sources, pointing out limitations of current research and attempting to indicate areas for future research. (You may even use visual representations such as graphs or charts to explain statistics from sources.)
Evaluate the ethical outcomes that result from your solution.
Provide at least one positive ethical outcome as well as at least one negative ethical outcome that could result from your solution.

 

Sample Solution

aving negligible, or clashing, impacts.

The development of the powers of the Presidential branch should be visible with President Lincoln’s suspension of the writ of habeas corpus and induction. The writ of habeas corpus, which required a confined individual to be brought to a court and have that confinement be decided as legitimate or unlawful. Suspending the writ of habeas corpus permitted Lincoln ability to capture a portion of his confederate foes, including John Merryman of Maryland. All this was a development of official power, as just Congress naturally had the ability to concede the writ of habeas corpus, yet when Congress gathered again in 1863, they supported Lincoln’s activities and captures that showed up with the suspension and gave the president lawful position to do this during disobedience. Chief power likewise expanded with enrollment, or the draft. Lincoln utilized enrollment in the Association, and a few men were all ready to pay for others to go in their place. This is a significant lawful turn of events, since it extended official ability to drive residents to participate in a conflict. Lincoln’s Respectful Conflict enrollment was the earliest draft presented by the public legislature of the US, despite the fact that the Thirteen provinces had a flimsy induction in pilgrim times. The suspension of the writ of habeas corpus, enrollment and the effect of the Nationwide conflict itself, always expanded the force of the public government, while bringing down that of the states.

The appearance of the Thirteenth, Fourteenth and Fifthteenth Corrections were significant lawful improvements at that point, yet were regularly sabotaged and under upheld to the place of least importance. Obviously, the Thirteenth Amendment finished asset subjugation and constrained states in the Alliance to perceive these protections given to African-Americans by the national government. The Fourteenth Amendment was additionally significant for its commitments, including those of fair treatment. A portion of these advances were impeded by Andrew Johnson – especially the 1866 Social liberties Act – however others were worked on after some time. The Slaughterhouse Cases (1873) diminished the chance of a more extensive arriving at extent of the Fourteenth Amendment, while US v. Reese et al. (1876) permitted states to put limitations on casting a ballot, limiting the Fifteenth Amendment to safeguarding just race-based prohibition. The meaning of the deficiencies of the support of these Corrections is the lion’s share of southern white refusal of dark privileges and opportunities, which prompted Jim Crow, and the multiplication of legitimate uprooting and inadequacy.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.