Monica Nevels

at
Categories
Tags

 

 

 

The authors are Monica Nevels who is Associate Professor Safety Professional, Certified Safety Professional and Wesley is a prof at the University of
Central Missouri that wrote multiple times about the safety issue concerning healthcare workers in the workplace.
Source 4: Seong, S.K., & Mendeloff, J. (2004). Assessing the accuracy of OSHA’s projections of the benefits of new safety standards. American journal of
industrial medicine, 45 4, 313-28.
The author’s assessment is critical to the point of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration OSHA accuracy is in question. They believe that
the OSHA group at the Department of Labor must work harder and more efficiently to provide a much clearer. In this writing, they compare the data that
OSHA was given in 1987 showing the amount of death that OSHA believes would have been prevented over a period. They have concluded with all the
relevant data; OSHA overestimated the number if death that they were able to prevent during a specific amount of time. For this, they have doubted the full
capacity of this organization within the Department of Labor. Overall, they believe that OSHA must develop a better metric system to record data to
accurately project injury in the workplace. They also believe that more research is needed to prove OSHA the effect of behavioral training that will decrease
the number of injuries outcome in the workplace.
These authors are extremely qualified scholars in the field of their expertise. Seong holds a Master’s in Public Administration from the Seoul National
University and is a doctoral student in the Graduate School of Public and International Affairs at the University of Pittsburgh and have written several articles
on this exact topic, meanwhile, Mendeloff is Assistant Professor of Political Sciences at the University of California of San Diego. He has written many other
articles in the most prominent one is Regulatory reform and OSHA policy. Both gentlemen are scholars.
Source 5: Weil, D. (1996). If OSHA is So Bad, Why is Compliance So Good? The RAND Journal of Economics, 27(3), 618–
640. https://doi.org/10.2307/2555847
In this article, David talks about the idea that the Occupational Safety and Health Administration is a bad branch within the Department of Labor. He believes
that OSHA has cost businesses money rather than being a good thing to them and he feels like OSHA brings little benefit to improve the safety of employees
in the workplace. His main point is about the level of effectiveness that exists with OSHA. He argued that OSHA is ineffective and believe that a deeper
assessment should be done in the Administration. For David, the cost that bears companies when OSHA accessing fine is extremely too high and bring little
benefit in return to those organizations. In his article, he felt that OSHA has been one of the most controversial entity that of regulations in the past two
decades. According to his point, does more compliance lead to less casualty and better safety in the workplace.

 

 

 

Sample Solution

sed on weakened health of companies in many countries. They also studied cheating and manipulating cases in financial reports and observed corporate governance of sampled entities. Those reports have confirmed the following: A. The need of having internal auditing function in all companies. B. The internal auditing management has to perform an effective role in governing and evaluating control systems and managing risks. This role of modern auditing is vague and does not define the functions and responsibilities of the internal auditor clearly towards risk management, observation and governing; so it motivates the researcher to study and reveal the role of internal auditing in Libyan industrial companies. 1.2. Issue of study: In the last few years, the increase of bankruptcy, insolvency cases and failure in many companies lead to more interest in internal auditing systems and to the urgent need to activate what is known as company governance. Concerns regarding the necessity of improving the role of internal auditor and adding new functions to the auditor to help in avoiding bankruptcy, insolvency and financial trespasses, particularly after the failure of external auditor in early detection of business risks and in issuing unmodified reports. Being all the time inside the company enables the internal auditor to become more aware of the nature of operations and the level of performance, and also to follow all the actions and all aspects of related activities. The internal auditor also performs a regular test around the year in order to include all types of company operations. So the functions performed by the internal audit of the company have developed. Namely, internal audit become that kind of function which is no longer limited to just testing financial and accounting operations, or even all company operations, it has got the role of testing and evaluating observation systems, and finding and evaluating risks surrounding the activities of the company which reduces related risks in accomplishing the targets of the company. The internal auditing has become a major component of any governing process in the company; it is the function that connects all governing components in the company (management board, auditing committee, external auditor), these various functions have made the internal auditing an activity that adds value. Most professional reports dealing with these developments have confirmed the role of internal auditing in testing and in evaluating observation systems, and in finding out and evaluating treating these risks and governing them. However, the internal audit function in Libya is still concentrating on exercising its traditional role and carrying out the observational function. Therefore, the importance of this role is significant and it should be revealed to industrial companies in Libya in order to illustrate how internal auditing can contribute in supporting the manage

This question has been answered.

Get Answer