Research Paper II (Islamic/Pre-Columbian architecture):
Your topic must address at least one structure from chapter 7 (Islamic Architecture) or 10 (Indigenous
Architecture in the Pre-Columbian Americas and Africa). You may use images from other chapters or
contemporary artists to compare/contrast. Your paper should be written in a formal manner using the MLA or
APA citation guidelines and include in-depth research and thoughtful analysis.
Focus on how the architecture connects to the culture or the user of the building. Formal elements to think about:
symbolism, technical innovation, and cultural context.
As you examine your object you can think about:
Any interesting historical events associated with the structure.
The intended function/purpose/meaning of the architecture.
Structural innovations.
How the structure was influenced by architecture that came before it.
How the structure reflects the beliefs/uses of the culture.
How the iconography or decoration (if there is any) helps the viewer understand the function/purpose of
the structure
regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating to take note of that while there is a limited ability to recall lumps of data, how much pieces in every one of those lumps can change broadly (Miller, 1956). Anyway it’s anything but a straightforward instance of having the memorable option huge pieces right away, somewhat that as each piece turns out to be more natural, it very well may be acclimatized into a lump, which is then recollected itself. Recoding is the interaction by which individual pieces are ‘recoded’ and allocated to lumps. Consequently the ends that can be drawn from Miller’s unique work is that, while there is an acknowledged breaking point to the quantity of pi
regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating to take note of that while there is a limited ability to recall lumps of data, how much pieces in every one of those lumps can change broadly (Miller, 1956). Anyway it’s anything but a straightforward instance of having the memorable option huge pieces right away, somewhat that as each piece turns out to be more natural, it very well may be acclimatized into a lump, which is then recollected itself. Recoding is the interaction by which individual pieces are ‘recoded’ and allocated to lumps. Consequently the ends that can be drawn from Miller’s unique work is that, while there is an acknowledged breaking point to the quantity of pi