Sample Solution

n the early 20th century, German Americans were the nation’s largest immigrant group. Although they were regarded positively when they immigrated to America, many faced attacks on their ethnicity when the United States went to war against Germany in 1917. The news article regarding this topic were mostly negative. Many articles held Germans in every adverse way possible. Yet, these articles created the Germans as a three-dimensional villain; media portrayed the Germans beyond a ruthless figure. Rather, the Germans were portrayed in several different lights: cunning, ruthless, helpless, manipulative, quiet, obnoxious, and scheming. It was almost as if the American government had a checklist of all the negative ways to portray the Germans. You can group the negatives and describe each one for us. I wonder if that changed over time with events in the war. If yes, the narrative organizational framework might make the most sense for you. There were undoubtedly clear instances of exaggeration, but it was likely that the American communities were confuddled with the constant efforts of the government and its propaganda against the German-Americans. Could it also be possible that the neighborhoods catalyzed the general acceptance of such propaganda? Although it is possible that many suspected some sort of bias or fabrications, the bandwagon of hating German-Americans and the stigma against speaking out definitely played a role in how the Anti-German articles were composed and received by the community. In fact, many sources I researched referred this era as “anti-German hysteria.” CITATION Similar to the Salem witch trials or the Communist Red Scare, German sentiment seems to erupt and then die down. Early news articles are much more emotion-based while the later articles, such as the one that talks of sauerkraut, mentions the foolishness of society for being too shallow.