Multiple stories and diversity of experiences

at
Categories
Tags

With Unit 5, we enter the wrap-up phase of this course. And we end with reflecting on your next step, by designing for it. First, watch this 3 1/2 min TED video on 8 Secrets of
Success

Since we are people with multiple stories and diversity of experiences, each of us will seek out different learning experiences to help us succeed. And, since most of you are interested in either pursuing your career as a therapist or furthering your course of study to become a psychologist, one major area comes to mind: what interaction brings out the best learner (or one of those success factors) in you!

Continuing the focus on your professional development, this discussion is a reflective post to help you prepare for future interactions with supervisors or current interactions with your professors. I want you to reflect on how you learn, as you plan to enter clinical training (or preparing for PhD) and/or are in a clinical context.

Respond to the following questions, based on your reflections and expectations:

– Based on your previous learning and/or work experiences, who would make an ideal clinical supervisor for you (and/or research supervisor for those of you who want to do PhD)? Describe his/her guidance and feedback style that would match your style of learning. (If you use terms such as critical, helpful, challenge me etc, describe what you mean by these terms since they mean different things to different people. Please take the time to give this thought).

– Assume you are shopping for a supervisor, what questions would you ask him/her/them, to learn about them, their style and/or their expectations?

Sample Solution

Firstly, Vittola argues after a war, it is the responsibility of the leader to judge what to do with the enemy (Begby et al (2006b), Page 332).. Again, proportionality is emphasised. For example, the Versailles treaty imposed after the First World War is questionably too harsh, as it was not all Germany’s fault for the war. This is supported by Frowe, who expresses two views in jus post bellum: Minimalism and Maximalism, which are very differing views. Minimalists suggest a more lenient approach while maximalist, supporting the above example, provides a harsher approach, punishing the enemy both economically and politically (Frowe (2010), Page 208). At the last instance, however, the aim of war is to establish peace security, so whatever needs to be done can be morally justified, if it follows the rules of jus ad bellum.
In conclusion, just war theory is very contestable and can argue in different ways. However, the establishment of a just peace is crucial, making all war type situation to have different ways of approaching (Frowe (2010), Page 227). Nevertheless, the just war theory comprises of jus ad bellum, jus in bello and jus post bellum, and it can be either morally controversial or justifiable depending on the proportionality of the circumstance. Therefore, there cannot be one definitive theory of the just war but only a theoretical guide to show how wars should be fought, showing normativity in its account, which answers the question to what a just war theory is.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.
Hi, how can I help?