Museums and related stuff

 

 

 

 

Discussion questions about Museums and related stuff:(so please be careful all the information and definition is suppose to be connected to Anthropology & Museums)

1)How has the history of ethnographic museums influenced our current ideas of exhibition and display?

2) How has collecting methods changed since earliest collecting to the present? How have they stayed the same?

3) After watching the video of Winona LaDuke and Naomi Klein, what was one takeaway you had of Winona’s discussion points?

4) Can objects or monuments “speak” for themselves? Why or why not?

5) Does anthropology need museums? Or do museums need anthropology? How do they shape one another?

6) Focusing on two case studies: Sara Baartman and Coco Fusco and Guillermo Gomez-Pena’s piece on Amerindians, let’s unpack the “us versus them” dichotomy and the implications with it. Watch clip from 1992 performance artists Coco Fusco and Guillermo Gomez-Pena in Madrid, Spain where they presented themselves as Amerindians who escaped Columbus and use readings on this performance to compare to article and images on web of Sara Baartman and discuss the commodification of humans-imperialisms effects on collecting and display and the present connection to body image, agency and authenticity.

7) How does an object play in the role of the celebratory in the ritual of citizenship?

8) How do you present various perspectives in one exhibit-past or original viewpoint, current viewpoints, etc.

9) What is the role of the museum?

10) What does it mean to be a witness? How can museums/monuments/memorials provide space to witness violence pasts and provide a space to teach tolerance and understanding?

Comments from Customer
I added the class notes for question 3
Discussion questions:

1)How has the history of ethnographic museums influenced our current ideas of exhibition and display?

2) How has collecting methods changed since earliest collecting to the present? How have they stayed the same?

3) After watching the video of Winona LaDuke and Naomi Klein, what was one takeaway you had of Winona’s discussion points? https://youtu.be/MDo-KtOKYZE

4) Can objects or monuments “speak” for themselves? Why or why not?

5) Does anthropology need museums? Or do museums need anthropology? How do they shape one another?
6) Focusing on two case studies: Sara Baartman and Coco Fusco and Guillermo Gomez-Pena’s piece on Amerindians, let’s unpack the “us versus them” dichotomy and the implications with it. Watch clip from 1992 performance artists Coco Fusco and Guillermo Gomez-Pena in Madrid, Spain where they presented themselves as Amerindians who escaped Columbus and use readings on this performance to compare to article and images on web of Sara Baartman and discuss the commodification of humans-imperialisms effects on collecting and display and the present connection to body image, agency and authenticity.
( https://www.artandeducation.net/classroom/video/244623/coco-fusco-and-guillermo-gmez-pea-the-couple-in-the-cage-two-undiscovered-amerindians-visit-the-west )

-Define one of the following based on readings/video:
* What is the Exhibitonary Complex?
* What is heritage?
* What is history?
* (https://vimeo.com/439042290)
7) How does an object play in the role of the celebratory in the ritual of citizenship?
(Duncan, Carol. 1991. “Art Museums and the Ritual of Citizenship.” In Exhibiting Cultures, edited by Ivan Karp and Steven D. Lavine, 88-103. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press.)

8) How do you present various perspectives in one exhibit-past or original viewpoint, current viewpoints, etc.

9) What is the role of the museum?
(Vartanian, Hrag. April 12, 2018. “Growing
Coalition Calls Brooklyn Museum ‘Out of Touch’ and Demands a Decolonization Commission”. In Hyperallergic. Accessed August 25, 2018.)

10) What does it mean to be a witness? How can museums/monuments/memorials provide space to witness violence pasts and provide a space to teach tolerance and understanding?
(Lehrer, Erica and Cynthia E. Milton. 2012. “Witnesses to Witnessing” in Curating Difficult Knowledge: Violent Pasts in Public Places, editors Erica Lehrer and Monica Patterson. Palgrave, London, pp. 1-22)

 

 

 

 

 

Sample Solution

Integrated Marketing Communications

Integrated Marketing Communications is a concept under which a company carefully integrates and coordinates its many communications channels to deliver a clear and consistency of the message and the complementary use of media. It is an integration of all marketing tools, approaches and resources within a company which maximizes impact on the consumer mind resulting in maximum profit at minimum cost. The major items of integrated marketing communication tools include: advertising, sales promotion, personal selling, public relations, direct marketing, events and experiences, social media marketing, and mobile marketing. In this competitive world with innumerable marketing and advertising mediums and powerful marketing campaigns, you have got to communicate a consistent marketing message using a 360-degree approach to strengthen your position in the market and have an impact on your prospective as well as existing customers.

 

What are the Barriers of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccination and Cervical Cancer Screening among Minority Women age 12-26?

Dynamic

Foundation: Minority ladies efficiently experience financial burdens, which put them despite more noteworthy impediments in accomplishing ideal wellbeing. Roughly 44 million ladies in the United States, almost 33% of all ladies in America, self-recognize as ladies of a minority racial or ethnic gathering. However, minority ladies passage more terrible than non-Hispanic white ladies over a wide scope of measures, with the absolute biggest abberations being that of HPV-related cervical malignancy mortality. Objective: The goal is to accentuate the obstructions of consideration in connection to cervical malignant growth screening and HPV inoculation, just as look at examples in boundaries like statistic, social, and wellbeing conviction factors among minority women.Methods: The information accumulation audit and procedure depended on article survey factors that were related with HPV antibody agreeableness, commencement, and arrangement finishing among pre-adult and youthful grown-up ladies of various racial, ethnic, and financial gatherings in the United States. Results: Selected qualities of the included examinations fought that an expected 12,000 ladies are determined to have cervical malignancy every year in the United States, and 4500,000 ladies overall create cervical disease every year. Higher paces of cervical malignant growth are found in US areas with huge minority and ruined populaces. End: It is basic for clinicians to advance minority ladies screening and early identification. Further intercession models need to reflect multifactorial determinants of screening usage.

Presentation

Foundation

While there have been walks in HPV and cervical malignant growth avoidance endeavors, numerous minority ladies no matter how you look at despite everything it experience noteworthy boundaries to mind. For instance, ladies from rustic and poor networks will in general have wellbeing ignorance concerning their own self-care, which likewise incorporates their doubt for the human services framework. Moreover, numerous minority ladies essentially need money related access to mind. Financial weaknesses (for example race, class, sex, training, occupation, and so forth.) are the fundamental issues. Despite the fact that numerous wellbeing endeavors are made by wellbeing experts, and wellbeing implications like instructive innovations and deterrent consideration procedures have been accomplished, there is a persistent financial and racial irregularity with both the finding and treatment of cervical malignancy, particularly the strains straightforwardly affected by HPV.

Explicit Aims

Our particular points are to initially recognize Health care obstructions and difficulties to cervical malignancy screening and HPV inoculation inside the number of inhabitants in minority ladies. We additionally need to reveal minority ladies, medicinal services supplier and human services framework hazard factors for cervical disease screening and HPV immunization, just as, social insurance difficulties and openings in improving cervical malignant growth screening rates among minority ladies. Finally, we need to pinpoint the medical caretakers’ jobs in avoiding cervical malignant growth in underserved racial or potentially ethnic populaces.

Techniques

Search Strategy

In June 2017,we looked through four electronic bibliographic databases (Google researcher, Medline, Pubmed and Cinahl) utilizing the hunt terms ‘HPV’ ‘cervical disease’ ‘pap smear’ ‘minority ladies’ ‘ethnic ladies’ and ‘wellbeing incongruities’. The majority of the investigations recognized during the database quest were surveyed for importance to the audit dependent on the data gave in the title, theoretical, and depiction of watchwords and terms. A full report was recovered for all investigations that met the incorporation criteria.

Consideration Criteria

The information gathering survey and procedure depended on article audit factors that were related with HPV antibody adequacy, inception, and arrangement consummation among pre-adult and youthful grown-up ladies of various racial, ethnic, and financial gatherings in the United States.

We looked into important friend surveyed and proof based subjective writing so as to recognize current immunization patterns, rates and factors related with HPV and cervical disease. Study discoveries an identified with race (dark, Latina, Asian), and financial disservices were condensed.

Qualification Criteria

Understanding ebb and flow inoculation patterns and the boundaries to arrangement inception and fruition, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) prescribes that 11 to multi year old youths get two dosages of the HPV antibody so as to secure against themselves against malignancies that are brought about by HPV. The HPV immunization arrangement can be given to young ladies starting at age 9 years of age, yet numerous guardians accept this age is unreasonably juvenile for an explicitly transmitted infection inoculation. Moreover, it is suggested by the CDC that young ladies and ladies age 13 through 26 years old who have not yet been immunized or finished the antibody arrangement to be given the HPV inoculation promptly to give HPV-malignancy related assurance.

In comprehension HPV inoculation parameters, it is fundamental that we also perceive holes in information and every one of the misguided judgments encompassing HPV immunization and cervical disease. At the point when the immunization is offered preceding HPV presentation, it is profoundly successful in keeping disease from two high-chance genotypes (HPV-16/HPV-18) of HPV, which causes around 70 percent of cervical malignant growths, and two generally safe (HPV-6/HPV-11) genotypes that are in charge of more than 90 percent of every single genital mole.

As we surveyed the fittingness of our criteria advantages, we concentrated on Black/African-American, Latina and non-white immature ladies age 12-26, minority teenager ladies revealed having sex, youthful ladies who have finished adolescence, and low pay and human services unskilled young ladies, who are excessively uninsured or have restricted access.

Quality Assessment

The methodological quality is critical to our examination. It was composed and nitty gritty situated. It displayed proof that there is a requirement for expanding HPV immunization among youthful minority ladies. The inability to accomplish impartial immunization has exacerbated wellbeing incongruities in HPV and cervical disease frequency and mortality. Research proposes that low-pay and minority ladies are hindered because of the distinction in cervical malignant growth screening, practices and convictions, just as medicinal services get to boundaries and fundamental hazard factors.

We utilized the ‘Exploration and Quality Scoring Method’ by Sackett and Haynes, the Jadad scale, and the things distributed by Cho and Bero to rate the nature of each investigation (Table 1). The scope of all out quality scores was from 0 to 9. Concentrates that went from 0 to 5 were viewed as low quality, though thinks about that extended from 6-9 were viewed as high caliber. Two raters autonomously coded factors utilizing Microsoft Excel. Inconsistencies were recognized and settled among our colleagues.

 

 

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.