Music in the 1960s, 1970s, and even today

 

 

 

In the 1960s, 1970s, and even today, music took on a heavy political tone as it was used to protest a variety of issues. Below is a list of protest songs. Choose one of the songs below, and write a 4-5 page argumentative essay. Include a clear claim, and consider the following questions in your paper. Your claim should be argumentative in that it can be supported and argued (for the refutation). For example, if I chose Aretha Franklin’s “Respect,” I could make the claim that, “While the song is seemingly simple, it’s rich in meaning.” Be sure to include an outline as well. Three outside sources are required for the assignment along with an annotated bibliography for the three sources you use. Research the lyrics as well as what was being protested and explain the following in your paper:
1)Identify the song, artist and year.
2) What is the song protesting?
3) Why would this song be protesting that particular thing at that particular time? (Be sure and reference the events and movements of the appropriate era and how the song references them)
4) Is the song effective in getting its message across?

Sample Solution

The 1960s saw significant changes in society, fashion, attitudes, and, most notably, music. Before 1963, the sound, style, and beliefs of the previous decade were still represented in the music of the sixties, and many of the hit records were by singers who had achieved widespread success in the 1950s, such as Elvis Presley, Ray Charles, Celine Dion, and The Everly Brothers. A multitude of social forces transformed what popular music was in 1963 and the years that followed, resulting in the diversity that we see now in music. The killing of President John F. Kennedy, the rise of the Vietnam War, and the advancement of the Civil Rights Movement all had a significant impact on American culture, and music began to reflect this shift.

arned cash from others since they are too lethargic to even consider observing business or exploit blaming a sickness, despite the fact that they are fit for work. The media will regularly provide details regarding debilitated individuals with newsworthy stories, instead of really zeroing in on covering reality, contributing towards the disdain wrongdoing of handicapped individuals. For instance, they won’t investigate how handicapped individuals are at high gamble of wrongdoing, as this won’t sell as well as writing about how debilitated individuals are burglarizing tenacious dedicated individuals. It is as though a people demon of impaired individuals is made through the media; we should fear the individuals who are guaranteeing benefits as it is depicted as something pessimistic in the public eye. In like manner, individuals enduring with ‘undetectable’ incapacities, like melancholy, are frequently peered downward on as others don’t see an actual inability and will simply accept some unacceptable reasons concerning why they are guaranteeing benefits; there is as yet a shame around psychological maladjustment which isn’t accounted for enough on all through the media. Media inclusion like this can prompt disdain violations and separation towards debilitated individuals. For instance, research proposes that there is an alarming measure of separation focusing on debilitated individuals, which will affect their lives consistently. 56% of handicapped people have revealed they have encountered pessimistic perspectives towards them due to their condition. Moreover, half of debilitated individuals state they have really confronted separation consistently, and 37 of these people emphatically accept that perspectives and perspectives towards them from others have changed in a more over pessimistic manner; thoughts individuals hold about incapacitated individuals are deteriorating (Scope, 2018). It very well may be seen that the room charge is an assault on incapacitated individuals’ privileges and isn’t really centered around the closure of a ‘extra room endowment’; it is simply being utilized as excuse. Research has found that the vast majority of those enduring with a handicap must choose the option to lessen spending on food, taking care of bills, etc, to address the issues of the room charge, because of the reality they are being denied help from crisis lodging installments. Papworth Trust, a handicap noble cause, observed that around 33% of incapacitated people are being rejected for help from optional lodging installments, which are set up by the public authority to offer help for the individuals who experience issues in paying their lease. Moreover, around 66% of those affected by rooms expressed as ‘spare’, are actu

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.