Negotiation Advocacy

 

Incorporate concepts of integrative bargaining, (i.e., win-win bargaining or interest-based bargaining). Your goal is to create an environment that increases the likelihood of reaching a mutually beneficial outcome for both parties.
Identify ways that Sharon can make a positive first impression, using tacit communication, such as body language, tone of voice, and so on. Explain your reasoning.
Identify examples of effective overt communication that Sharon can use in this negotiation. Explain your reasoning.
Suggest a location for the negotiation session that will create confidence in both Sharon and Alice and a positive basis for the discussion.
Identify situation(s) when should Sharon use tacit communication. In which situation(s) should Sharon use overt communication? Explain your reasoning.
Compare the impact of the overt and tacit communication in these situations and how they will affect the message Sharon is sending.

 

 

Sample Solution

Sharon’s Negotiation with Alice: A Multi-Faceted Approach

Creating a Win-Win Environment

Sharon is preparing for a negotiation with Alice. To increase the likelihood of a mutually beneficial outcome, she can leverage integrative bargaining techniques:

  • Focus on Interests, Not Positions: Instead of rigidly focusing on a specific outcome (her position), Sharon should delve into the underlying needs and interests of both parties. What does Alice truly value in this negotiation? What are Sharon’s core interests beyond her initial stance?
  • Brainstorm Solutions: By working together creatively, they can explore solutions that address both their needs. Brainstorming fosters a collaborative spirit and opens doors to unexpected win-win scenarios.
  • Be Open to Compromise: While Sharon should advocate for her needs, some level of compromise might be necessary.

Positive First Impression through Tacit Communication

Sharon can make a positive first impression through nonverbal cues:

  • Body Language: Maintaining eye contact, a confident posture with relaxed shoulders, and a genuine smile project trustworthiness and openness.
  • Facial Expressions: Nodding occasionally shows she’s engaged and listening actively. Avoiding frowns or crossed arms portrays receptiveness to Alice’s perspective.
  • Tone of Voice: A friendly, professional tone fosters a collaborative atmosphere.

Effective Overt Communication

Sharon can use clear verbal communication to enhance the negotiation:

  • Active Listening: Demonstrating attentiveness through verbal cues like “I understand” and summarizing Alice’s points shows respect and encourages open communication.
  • “I” Statements: Owning her perspective with phrases like “I feel” or “I would like” allows Sharon to express her needs assertively without placing blame.
  • Open-Ended Questions: Asking questions that go beyond “yes” or “no” encourages Alice to elaborate on her needs and priorities, creating a more transparent negotiation.

Location, Location, Location

Choosing the right location sets the tone for the discussion:

  • Neutral Territory: A neutral location like a conference room demonstrates a professional approach and reduces any power imbalance that might arise if the meeting is held in one person’s office.
  • Comfortable Environment: The space should be comfortable and free from distractions, allowing for focused conversation.

Tacit vs. Overt Communication: Choosing the Right Tool

  • Tacit Communication for Building Rapport: When establishing trust and rapport at the beginning of the negotiation, tacit communication like nonverbal cues is crucial. It creates a comfortable atmosphere for open dialogue.
  • Overt Communication for Clarity and Specificity: Once rapport is established, overt communication becomes essential. Clearly stating needs, interests, and potential solutions ensures both parties are on the same page and avoids misunderstandings.

Impact Comparison

  • Tacit Communication: Subtle cues can set the emotional tone, build trust, and create a foundation for successful negotiation. However, they can be open to misinterpretation.
  • Overt Communication: Clear verbal communication ensures clarity and reduces ambiguity. However, without a foundation of trust built through tacit communication, it could come across as overly assertive or demanding.

Conclusion

Sharon’s success hinges on a strategic combination of integrative bargaining techniques, positive nonverbal cues, and clear verbal communication. By creating a win-win environment and fostering trust through both tacit and overt communication, Sharon can significantly increase the chances of reaching a mutually beneficial agreement with Alice.

 

This question has been answered.

Get Answer