Nitrogen Absorption Rate

 

Phase 2:
It is all about Nitrogen Absorption rate, and for this I have to choose direction and I choose the direction along x-axis. and how the nitrogen absorbs, and when Nitrogen pass through the plant. And with the increase in Nitrogen, the growth of plants will increase and I made the complex model (As, in my model, there is a double derivative means partial double derivative, Laplace transform and it goes with both respect to time and axis. I will find in Absorption rate that how much Nitrogen is going in the plant.
M_x (∂^2 N(x,t))/(∂x^2 )-S ∂N(x,t)/∂x-∂N/∂x=N_T (x,t) ———> 1
For solving N_T (x_1 t), we have equation
N_D (∂^2 N(x,t))/(∂x^2 )- N_c N_T (x,t)-(∂N_T (x,t))/∂x=0———>2
So, in above these 2 equations:
S is Average velocity of air
M_x is coefficient of axial dispersion that describes the manner in which the Nitrogen move relative to a point.
N is change of concentration with time and distance along a particular path bounded by a structure of plant
N_c is transfer coefficient of Nitrogen
N_D is Nitrogen absorption rate
Boundary conditions for N_T
N_T (x,0)=exp⁡(-√((N_c-a)/N_D ) x) Here N_c≥0 and N_D>0
N_T (0,t)=exp⁡(-at) Here t>0
N_T (∞,t)=0 Here t>0
Boundary Conditions for N
N(x,0)=N_(0 ) Here x≥0
N(0,t)=N_1 Here t>0
N(∞,t)=0
Here N_(0 ) and N_1 are constants
Solution of N_T
Using Laplace transform on equation 2
L{N_D (∂^2 N_T (x,t))/(∂x^2 )}-N_c L{N_T (x,t)}-L{(∂N_T (x,t))/∂x}=L{0}———>3
Solving Laplace seperately
L{N_D (∂^2 N_T (x,t))/(∂x^2 )}= {N_D (d^2 N_T (x,q))/(dx^2 )}
As N_T (x,q)= L{N_T (x,t)}
L{(∂N_T (x,t))/∂x}=qN_T (x,q)-N_T (x,0)
N_T (x,0)=exp⁡(-√((N_c-a)/N_D ) x)
Putting values in equation 3
N_D (d^2 N_T (x,q))/(dx^2 )-(N_c+q) N_T (x,q)=-exp⁡(-√((N_c-a)/N_D ) x) ———>4
Finding solution by using method of characteristic equation and indeterminate coefficient methods
N_T (x,q)= c_1 exp⁡(-√((N_c-a)/N_D ) x)+c_2 exp⁡(√((N_c-a)/N_D ) x)+(1/(a+q)) exp⁡(-√((N_c-a)/N_D ) x)
Finding value of c_1 and c_2 using boundary conditions
We can obtain c_2=0 and c_1=0
So,
N_T (x,q)= (1/(a+q)) exp⁡(-√((N_c-a)/N_D ) x)
Finally
L^(-1) {N_T (x,q)}= L^(-1) {(1/(a+q)) exp⁡(-√((N_c-a)/N_D ) x) }

N_T (x,q)=exp⁡(-√((N_c-a)/N_D ) x) L_q^(-1) {(1/(a+q))}
N_T (x,t)=exp[-(at+√((N_c-a)/N_D ) x]———>5
Now, obtaining solution for equation 1
Applying Laplace Transform on equation 1
L{(∂^2 N(x,t))/(∂x^2 )}-L{S ∂N(x,t)/∂x}-L{∂N/∂x}= (exp⁡(-√((N_c-a)/N_D ) x))/M_x L{exp⁡(-at)}
We get
N(x,q)=c_1 exp[x/2(S/M_x -√((s^2+4M_x q)/M_x ))]+c_2 [x/2(S/M_x +√((s^2+4M_x q)/M_x ))]
Finding c_1 and c_2by using boundary conditions
c_2=0
c_1=N_1/q-[(N_0 (q+a)(2-N_0 (q+a)-1)/((q-∝)(q+a)-qN_0 〖(q+a)〗^2 )]
We get
N(x,q)=[1/q+1/((q-∝)(q+a))]exp[x/2(S/M_x -√((s^2+4M_x q)/M_x ))]-1/(q+a)(q-a) exp⁡(-√((N_c-a)/N_D x))———>6
Apply inverse Laplace on equation 6, we get
N(x,t)=1/2 exp⁡(Sx/(2M_x )) [exp⁡((-Sx)/(2M_x )) erf⁡((x-St)/(2√(M_x t))) ]+exp⁡(Sx/(2M_x ))erfc((x+St)/(2√(M_x t)))
±(exp⁡(∝t))/((∝+a)) {exp (±x√(S^2+4M_x∝))/(2M_x ) erf (x-t√(S^2+4M_x∝))/(2√(M_x t))}-exp⁡(x√((N_c-a)/N_D )) 1/(∝+a) [exp⁡(∝t)-exp(-∝t)]
Here, N(x,t) is the solution.

 

 

 

 

Phase 3

In the following model ‘t‘ is time and ‘x‘ is the space along the Nitrogen bounded by an layers, not allowing Nitrogen transfer easily. ‘S‘ is speed of Nitrogen and M_{x} is the axial dispersion coefficient responsible for describing how the air move in a system with respect to a point, both are positive constants.
In order to make the model more realistic, we consider the semi constrained, enabling air transfer between different sides.
It is well known that the transfer of Nitrogen affects the absorption rate. This
factor has been taken into account here. We have drawn the absorption graphs
for the case when the concentration level of Nitrogen decreases considerably. The diffusion transport of various substrates between surrounding tissue structures has been studied here. We conclude the following important results in this study. The variation of
concentration of the Nitrogen in single direction is evident from the graphs and it decreases as we
move away from the one end. Thus the absorption rate at a large distance from the surface are not capable of getting sufficient Nitrogen.

Dependant Independent
t N x ∆N ∆x ∆N/∆x x
15 0.001 0.9894 0.1 -0.3076 -0.325097529 0.9894
15 0.101 0.6818 0.1 -0.2125 -0.470588235 0.6818
15 0.201 0.4693 0.1 -0.1466 -0.68212824 0.4693
15 0.301 0.3227 0.1 -0.1009 -0.991080278 0.3227
15 0.401 0.2218 0.1 -0.0695 -1.438848921 0.2218
15 0.501 0.1523 0.1 -0.0478 -2.092050209 0.1523
15 0.601 0.1045 0.1 -0.0328 -3.048780488 0.1045
15 0.701 0.0717 0.1 -0.0226 -4.424778761 0.0717
15 0.801 0.0491 0.1 -0.0155 -6.451612903 0.0491
15 0.901 0.0336 0.1 -0.0336 -2.976190476 0.0336

 

Differential Equation Model is:

M_x (∂^2 N(x,t))/(∂x^2 )-S ∂N(x,t)/∂x-∂N/∂x=N_T (x,t) ———> 1
For solving N_T (x_1 t), we have equation
N_D (∂^2 N(x,t))/(∂x^2 )- N_c N_T (x,t)-(∂N_T (x,t))/∂x=0———>2
So, in above these 2 equations:
S is Average velocity of air
M_x is coefficient of axial dispersion that describes the manner in which the Nitrogen move relative to a point.
N is change of concentration with time and distance along a particular path bounded by a structure of plant
N_c is transfer coefficient of Nitrogen
N_D is Nitrogen absorption rate

 

 

 

 

The graphs show that the level of Nitrogen decreases with x until
normalcy in the condition is maintained. The graphs exhibit the
absorption rate in the one direction for specific values of parameters. With this type of information, one may predict the effects of absorption for a certain set of parameters.

 

 

 

 

Phase 4
We need to solve a system of the following two equations in MATLAB:
M_x (∂^2 N(x,t))/(∂x^2 )-S ∂N(x,t)/∂x-∂N/∂x=N_T (x,t) ———> 1
N_D (∂^2 N(x,t))/(∂x^2 )-N_c N_T (x,t)-(∂N_T (x,t))/∂x=0———>2

We can rewrite the first equation more compactly as:
M_x (∂^2 N(x,t))/(∂x^2 )-(S+1)∂N(x,t)/∂x=N_T (x,t)
We need to convert these equations into a form that is accepted by MATLAB:

This is the format that is accepted by the MATLAB PDE solver function.
We write the equations in matrix form:
[■(0&0@0&0)] ∂/∂t (■(N_T@N))=∂/∂x [■(M_x ∂N/∂x-(S+1)N@N_D ∂N/∂x-N_T )]+[■(-N_T@-N_C N_T )]
This is in the standard form required by MATLAB.
The initial conditions are:
N_T (x,0)=exp(-√((N_c-a)/N_D ) x)HereN_c≥0∧N_D>0
N(x,0)=N(x,0)=N_0 Herex≥0
The boundary conditions for the system are:
N_T (0,t)=exp(-at),t>0
N_T (∞,t)=0 ,t>0
and
N(0,t)=N_1,t>0
N(∞,t)=0
The MATLAB PDE solver expects the boundary conditions to be of the form:

So, we write them as follows:
For x=0,
[■(N_T-e^(-at)@N-N_1 )]+[■(0@0)].[■(M_x ∂N/∂x-(S+1)N@N_D ∂N/∂x-N_T )]=0
For x=∞, the boundary condition becomes:
[■(N_T@N)]+[■(0@0)].[■(M_x ∂N/∂x-(S+1)N@N_D ∂N/∂x-N_T )]=0
For simplicity, we set all unknown coefficients equal to 1 for ease of programming in MATLAB.
The graphical solution for NT is:

The graphical solution for N is:

 

 

 

Sample Solution

orn a blank canvas and their lives are determined by varying experiences, positive interactions whilst acquiring different attributes and not due to DNA. She believed men and women were born equal and brains were malleable by culture, life experiences and desires, whereas Freud (1961) argued this and believed men and women’s brains were very different and the way they were formed was wholly down to DNA. Freud (1961) founded the study of psychoanalysis, he believed traumas and unresolved issues during childhood could be coaxed out by sensitive talk therapy. This can be seen in settings today by way of one:one counselling or through emotional literacy. Place2Be (1994) delivers school based therapeutic interventions. A large study was carried out on 47,000 children in primary schools, based on the findings of Place2Be, children’s social and emotional wellbeing had improved as perceived by their family members and teachers following interventions (White Et al., 2009). Supporting this Fox and Butler (2007) carried out a small-scale study on 219 pupils, attempting to discover whether counselling is successful in schools. The results suggested that the treatment delivered to the children, had less distress and fewer problems were observed. However, they recommended further research is required, to discover when and to who it was more of a success to. The evidence suggests that pupils receiving psychological therapies were a success however, The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE, 2010) expressed the opinion and recommended several forms of therapy as first-line interventions, not talk therapy or counselling in isolation. Another essential point regarding one:one counselling and emotional literacy is the relationship a child has with the facilitator. Mindmatters (n.d.) advocates how vital it is for children to have a trusting and caring relationship with the individual, as a result of this trust and understanding, will promote open communication. Similarly, Bowlby (1969) suggested that children come into this world with an innate response of survival; form attachments to survive. Consequently, if secure attachments are not formed this would lead to distress and negative experiences concluding that a trusting relationship is not formed between the pupil and the facilitator. Belsky and Fearon (2002) support Bowlby and state ‘poor attachment outcomes are associated with long-term adverse consequences in cognitive, adaptive, and behavioral domains’. Comparing Maslow (1968c), Bronfenbrenner (1979) Sameroff (2010) and Shonokoff an

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.