Noncompliant Patient

Ms. C, 72 years old, has diabetes mellitus, hypertension, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and coronary artery disease. She lives alone. She recently was discharged from the hospital after treatment for an acute myocardial infarction. She had been doing well before this admission. You are the home health nurse assigned to visit Ms. C. Ms. C’s son tells you he is concerned that his mother will not follow up with all the medications she is supposed to take. He states that she has not been very compliant with treatment in the past.

As the home health nurse, how would you approach Ms. C?

What risk factors might interfere with Ms. C’s plan of care?

What must you evaluate to include in the plan of care?

Sample Solution

Non-compliant Patient

Non-compliant is doctor-shorthand for patients who don’t take their medications or follow medical recommendations. When approaching a non-compliant patient, you must remember that you as the staff member, cannot make a person do anything, your task is not making a person comply, instead, your job is to explain and enforce the consequences of the person’s choice of compliance or noncompliance. Poor compliance can lead to disease complications, avoidable exacerbation and frequent admissions for patients, as well as increasing costs for health systems and the community. Case managers are in unique position to help patients and the system break these barriers and solve problems that hinder compliance.

obin disputed that most of the developed democratic and capitalist states adopted Keynesian demand policies managed after the World War II. 1950-1975 echoed unrivaled prosperity proven by an increase in the global trade and stability (TOBIN, J. 1983). It was around that time that most economies observed low inflation and unemployment rates. It is obvious that UK and western economies experienced maximum employment in the post-war era, because governments kept their dedications when it comes to full employment, basing on Keynesianism methods (pethoukokis, 2011). Before the 1980s, there was conventional knowledge suggesting stabilization of the real output in America’s economy because of the integrated and discretionary stabilization approaches putting in place after 1946, and specifically after 1961, just before the Second World War. This is an example of a vastly held empirical overview concerning the USA’s economy (pethoukokis, 2011).
On the other side, this oversimplification that the period after 1945 was firmer that the period before the Great Depression was disputed by Romer (Romer, C.1992).
According to him, the business sequence throughout the pre-Great Depression was somehow more harsh than economic uncertainty witnessed after 1945. For C. Romer, a close assessment of unemployment, industrial manufacture and Gross National Product (GNP) data showed that procedures used in conveying these data described systematic preferences in findings. Romer used reliable post-1945 and pre-1945 figures to prove that both booms and slumps were very severe during the time after 1945 (Romer, C.1992). The deduction made by Romer was that there was slight indication to conclude that the US economy before 1929 was more unstable than after 1945. Despite a little failure and volatility of real macroeconomic indicators, and the harshness of slumps between the pre-1916 and post 1945 periods, there is enough indication to assume that slumps reduced and became constant.
The influence of the Keynesian stabilization policies included stretching the post-1945 growths and averting extreme economic recessions (Romer,C 1992). It is apparent that the increased impact and spread of Keynesianism can be credited to a conservative opinion that economic stability during the post-war era was quite higher than in the pre-1914 era, which was depicted by the Keynesian rev

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.