NP practice resource on NYSED

 

Read the NP practice resource on NYSED (New York State Education Department) and post the answer to the question on Blackboard.

RESPONSE MUST BE IN YOUR OWN WORDS. NO CREDIT WILL BE GIVEN IF YOU COPY DIRECTLY FROM A WEBSITE OR TEXT.

https://www.op.nysed.gov/professions/nurse-practitioners/professional-practice/practice-requirements

https://www.op.nysed.gov/professions/nurse-practitioners/laws-rules-regulations
RESPONSE MUST BE IN YOUR OWN WORDS. NO CREDIT WILL BE GIVEN IF YOU COPY DIRECTLY FROM A WEBSITE OR TEXT.

1. What kind of practice authority do NPs have in New York State?
2. Can an NP practice independently in NYS?
3. Can an NP open his/her/their own practice?
4. Can an NP prescribe medications in NYS?
5. Does an NP need a collaborating MD to practice in New York State?

Sample Solution

In New York State, Nurse Practitioners (NPs) are allowed to practice independently or collaborate with a physician. NPs have the authority to diagnose, treat and manage acute and chronic health care problems. They can also provide preventative services such as health maintenance exams, physicals and screenings; order diagnostic studies; prescribe medications including controlled substances; make referrals for specialty care when necessary; and perform certain procedures according to their education, experience, certification and scope of practice (New York State Education Department [NYSED], 2019). The level of autonomy that an NP has in terms of independent practice depends on which type of NP license they hold.

Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs) who opt for full authority licensure in New York have the most autonomy when it comes to practicing independently. This includes being able to diagnose medical conditions without supervision or collaboration with another healthcare provider. APRNs with this licensure may use their own name on prescriptions if they choose but must still operate within their approved scope of practice as defined by regulations set forth by the NYS Board of Nursing (NYSED, 2019).

On the other hand, those who obtain collaborative agreement licenses cannot practice without direct oversight from a collaborating physician. While this type of license allows NPs some degree of autonomous decision-making power in regards to treatments and prescribing medications within their scope as well as allowing them use their own name on prescriptions if desired, all decisions must first be approved by a collaborating physician before implementation into patient care plans is possible (NYSED, 2019).

Overall, these two types allow different levels of independent practice for NPs depending upon individual circumstances so each practitioner should research laws surrounding these licensing options thoroughly before deciding which route best suits individual goals related to professional growth along with meeting needs specific patient populations served whether through working at clinics or private practices throughout New York State.

In practically every one of the models over, the progressions include the execution of continuous and less conventional execution registrations to zero in on improvement, and a more grounded accentuation on standard criticism utilizing innovation. There is a developing pattern to cancel/deprioritise execution examinations with regular, casual registrations among chiefs and representatives across various businesses. Innovation organizations have driven the way (for example Adobe, Juniper Frameworks, Dell, Microsoft, and IBM), joined by proficient administrations firms (for example Deloitte, Accenture, PwC), early adopters in different businesses (for example Hole, Lear, OppenheimerFunds), and, surprisingly, the utilities goliath General Electric, that was a long-lasting good example for conventional examinations (Cappelli and Tavis, 2016).

This likewise shows a shift from Hypothesis X, which recommends that associations should propel workers with material prizes and discipline to Hypothesis Y, which contends that representatives need to perform well and will do so whenever upheld appropriately (McGregor, 1957).

3.3 Viable Ramifications OF Abrogating OR DEPRIORITISING

3.3.1 Information catch and data over-burden

Assuming execution evaluations are nullified/deprioritised, they should be supplanted with a framework that is capable track work designs. This calls for incessant and constant discussions among administrators and representatives, for instance when issues become visible or project/task has been finished. Cappelli and Tavis (2016) contend that his will permit chiefs to quickly resolve issues in current execution and foster future abilities.

In any case, with a move towards constant and successive criticism, the quantity of information focuses will without a doubt increment. Cappelli and Tavis (2016) characterize this as criticism firehose, which can prompt data over-burden. Moreover, whist HR frameworks play had a significant impact in execution examinations (Sulsky and Keown, 1998), their plan is restricted to reporting execution evaluations, and consequently these current frameworks are not generally ready to oblige consistent criticism.

This expects associations to contemplate HR frameworks and how criticism will be gathered, ordered and gave to representatives (for example versatile applications, online instruments). Getting this right is significant as criticism is emphatically connected with work fulfillment, which can be connected to higher efficiency and execution (Fletcher and Williams, 1996)

3.3.2 Social perspectives

A large part of the exploration distributed on execution evaluations begins from created nations. Representatives inside UK and USA will generally respond diversely to criticism, regardless of having similitudes in culture (Early and Stubblebine, 1989). Thusly, scholarly exploration needs to think about the way of life elements of different societies, especially in the arising economies.

In addition, canceling/deprioritising execution evaluations to zero in on constant and multi-source criticism, enables administrators to give basic appraisals across the association’s progressive system. This approach can be met fluctuating responses in view of the social foundations of

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.