Oh, look at that sweet little dog!

 

‘Oh, look at that sweet little dog! Poor thing, tied up out here in the cold. I feel so sorry for him! Oh well, come on, we’d better get our dinner, I’m having the fried chicken , yummy.’ Critically analyse this statement using theoretical ideas from across the module.

 

 

Sample Solution

This statement highlights the issue of speciesism which is a form of prejudice that allows preferential treatment to humans over other animals (Francione, 1995). Speciesism is evident in this example as the speaker expresses compassion for the ‘sweet little dog’ yet also ignores their distress and chooses to carry on with their dinner plans. This can be seen as an example of hegemonic practices – dominant cultural beliefs around human superiority which normalize speciesist behavior (Adams & Donovan, 1995).

The idea that certain animals should be treated differently to others due to their perceived usefulness or cuteness can also be linked to commodification theory where non-human animals are viewed as products for consumption (McClintock & Holmes, 2020). In particular, meat consumption has been seen as a way for people from different social classes and cultures to signify status in society (Bourdieu 1984), suggesting that this type of speciesism may stem from underlying power structures. The language used by the speaker regarding dinner further reinforces this notion – such terminology like “yummy” implies pleasure derived from consuming animal products.

Therefore although we may want to express empathy towards other creatures it is important that our responses do not reinforce oppressive systems such as speciesism. To achieve this would require an acknowledgement of our interdependence with other beings and questioning attitudes based on traditional values around human entitlement (Adams & Donovan 1995). It is only then that we might make progress towards creating a more equal society where all living things have value regardless of their ability or perceived worth.

regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating to take note of that while there is a limited ability to recall lumps of data, how much pieces in every one of those lumps can change broadly (Miller, 1956). Anyway it’s anything but a straightforward instance of having the memorable option huge pieces right away, somewhat that as each piece turns out to be more natural, it very well may be acclimatized into a lump, which is then recollected itself. Recoding is the interaction by which individual pieces are ‘recoded’ and allocated to lumps. Consequently the ends that can be drawn from Miller’s unique work is that, while there is an acknowledged breaking point to the quantity of pieces of data that can be put away in prompt (present moment) memory, how much data inside every one of those lumps can be very high, without unfavorably influencing the review of similar number

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.