Organization in global hospitality and tourism industry

at
Categories
Tags

identify an organization in global hospitality and tourism industry publicly recognized for taking Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) into consideration, analyse its CSR policy, propose an action plan for implementing a new CSR activity, develop an individual report (2’500 words), and make a presentation of the findings highlighting the key findings/recommendations/action plan.

 

Sample Solution

Marriott International is an organization in the global hospitality and tourism industry that is publicly recognized for taking Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) into consideration. The company has a comprehensive CSR policy, which consists of three strategic commitments: responsible business practices, sustainable development, and community involvement. Marriott’s responsible business practices refer to their commitment to integrity, safety and ethical standards throughout all aspects of their operations. Sustainable development entails initiatives such as reducing energy use and water consumption at properties; investing in renewable energy sources; collaborating with suppliers on waste minimization efforts; and promoting sustainability education for guests. The company also engages actively with local communities through a range of initiatives including providing educational scholarships to local students; supporting job-training programmes for economically disadvantaged populations; implementing recycling programs in collaboration with community groups; and fundraising campaigns for charitable organizations around the world.

As part of Marriott International’s CSR action plan, I propose creating more opportunities for environmental education programmes targeting children within the communities surrounding its hotels. By offering courses related to environmental stewardship such as composting or green gardening techniques, it would provide both knowledge and hands-on experience that could be used upon returning home from school holidays or extended stays at one of Marriott’s properties (Biswas & Saha 2020). This activity could be implemented by partnering with schools or other community organizations in order to arrange group field trips where students can visit nearby attractions related to conservation activities while learning about sustainability from experts along the way (Jindal 2021). Moreover, this type of programme could further engage customers staying at the hotel by allowing them access to the same educational experiences offered exclusively elsewhere by invitation only – thus it would give them an additional incentive to book accommodation there over similar establishments without these amenities nearby.

In conclusion, Marriott International’s existing CSR policy serves as a blueprint for how corporations should take responsibility for social issues not just within their own organization but also outside amongst stakeholders across various communities worldwide. My proposed action plan aims at encouraging greater engagement between corporate entities like Marriott International and local communities via environmental education programmes specifically designed towards inspiring future generations towards more conscious decisions concerning our shared planet.

is leads to question of what qualifies to be a combatant, and whether it is lawful to kill each other as combatants. Combatants are people who are involved directly or indirectly with the war and it is lawful to kill ‘to shelter the innocent from harm…punish evildoers (Begby et al (2006b), Page 290).However, as mentioned above civilian cannot be harmed, showing combatants as the only legitimate targets, another condition of jus in bello, as ‘we may not use the sword against those who have not harmed us (Begby et al (2006b), Page 314).’ In addition, Frowe suggested combatants must be identified as combatants, to avoid the presence of guerrilla warfare which can end up in a higher death count, for example, the Vietnam War. Moreover, he argued they must be part of the army, bear arms and apply to the rules of jus in bello. (Frowe (2011), Page 101-3). This suggests Frowe seeks a fair, just war between two participants avoiding non-combatant deaths, but wouldn’t this lead to higher death rate for combatants, as both sides have relatively equal chance to win since both use similar tactics? Nevertheless, arguably Frowe will argue that combatant can lawfully kill each other, showing this is just, which is also supported by Vittola, who states: ‘it is lawful to draw the sword and use it against malefactors (Begby et al (2006b), Page 309).’
In addition, Vittola expresses the extent of military tactics used, but never reaches a conclusion whether it’s lawful or not to proceed these actions, as he constantly found a middle ground, where it can be lawful to do such things but never always (Begby et al (2006b), Page 326-31). This is supported by Frowe, who measures the legitimate tactics according to proportionality and military necessity. It depends on the magnitude of how much damage done to one another, in order to judge the actions after a war. For example, one cannot simply nuke the terrorist groups throughout the middle-east, because it is not only proportional, it will damage the whole population, an unintended consequence. More importantly, the soldiers must have the right intention in what they are going to achieve, sacrificing the costs to their actions. For example: if soldiers want to execute all prisoners of war, they must do it for the right intention and for a just cause, proportional to the harm done to them. This is supported by Vittola: ‘not always lawful to execute all combatants…we must take account… scale of the injury inflicted by the enemy.’ This is further supported by Frowe approach, which

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.
Hi, how can I help?