ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE ASSESSMENT

Complete the Organizational Culture Assessment Instrument (see attached). You will be including the
numerical and visual chart results as an appendix in your paper.
Download an editable template of the chart in MS Word to insert your results (see attached).
Watch tutorial(see attached) to see how to create or edit the chart in MS Word.
Using the information from your assigned readings, the self-paced tutorial and your completed OCAI
assessment, discuss the following in a paper.
Paper should be double-spaced using APA format. Two (2) peer-reviewed journal and at least one (1) assigned
course reading references. Include an introduction and conclusion in the paper.
1. In which quadrants did you note the greatest difference between current culture and future culture? What
organizational changes are needed based on your OCAI scores?
2. In what quadrants do you see a need to increase emphasis? Decrease emphasis?
3. What does it mean to change in your identified quadrant (greatest difference between now and future)?
What will happen if change does not occur in this quadrant? Would these changes be substantial,
transformative, incremental or evolutionary? Why? Identify two (2) specific, actionable strategies that are
critical to changing culture with two (2) short-term and two (2) long-term goals. How will you measure success
of these goals?

Sample Solution

ichael J Hogan provides a supporting argument to this in that US integration into Europe was key for European economic recovery and was essential for the long term interests of the USA, “The Marshall plan rested squarely on an American conviction that European economic recovery was essential to the long term interests of the United States.”. Hogan’s approach somewhat validates Kolko in implementing the importance that the economics had behind the Marshall plan. But also backs up Kolko’s argument of economic self-interest. Hogan says American policy makers saw “economic integration as the best way to achieve the interrelated economic, political, and strategic goals on their agenda”.

Kolko’s anti-capitalist views are one reason why he fails to mention communism as a motive for the Marshall Plan, weakening his argument. Kolko appears to overlook communism as a factor despite taking interest in “the direction of the world economy”, which would indicate a concern of communism influence. Hogan who has a similar economic argument does comment on a communism motive behind the Marshall plan, which provides his argument with more depth and therefore a more balanced piece then Kolko. Hogan argues “American officials saw Marshall’s plan as a way to break soviet influence in Eastern Europe”. I agree that the lack of economic stability could strengthen communist parties, as in France the communist party was the strongest politically, winning 25% of the votes that year. To further maintenance this Hogan says “This level of expenditure was necessary to avert ‘economic, social, and political’ chaos in Europe, (and) contain communism”. This argument is stronger than Kolko as its undeniable that economic motives were important as clearly Europe needed the money however the communist ideology was an underlying fear as it would have had the influence over the direction of world trade and economics as a whole in the long term. This subsequently shows Kolko is wrong to say it’s all down to economics. Truman introduced the Truman doctrine only a year before the Marshall plan. I would argue that this clearly shows Truman’s stance on communism and that it’s at the for-front of his policies. In the New York, St Patrick’s day address on 17 March 1948 while discu

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.