1. What does an organizational environment include? What is the impact of rapid environmental changes on organizations?
2. Describe some factors causing environmental complexity for an organization of your choice. How might this environmental complexity lead to organizational complexity? Explain.
3. Summarize the difference between individual ethics and organizational ethics. What do you think is the source of each type of ethics? Describe the methods organizations can utilize to shape ethical values among its employees.
4. Managers and scholars alike debate the relationship between corporate social responsibility and an organization’s financial performance. Some say socially responsible actions enhance an organization’s financial performance, while others say CSR has little or no effect on an organization’s financial performance. What do you think? Defend your position.
5. Refer to the Case for Analysis, Fiedler, Philips & Wilson Design, at the end of chapter 7. What is the ethical responsibility of Clark Wilson and the architectural firm in this situation? Explain.
Organizational environment
The organizational environment is the set of forces surrounding an organization. These forces may hamper or facilitate the organization`s access to resources, which means they can both offer opportunities and pose threats. Moreover, while these resources are valuable for the organization, they are also scarce (Riggio, 2018). Organizational environment denotes internal and external environmental factors influencing organizational activates and decision making. An organization`s external environment consists of the entities, conditions, events, and factors surrounding the organization that influence choices and activities and determine its opportunities and threats.it is also called an operating environment. An organization`s internal environment consists of the entities, conditions, events, and factors within the organization that influence choices and activities.
result of good initiative, and is again the obligation of the pioneer to guarantee the gathering are working effectively together. Exceptionally working groups are fundamental inside associations to expand efficiency and part fulfillment, by using the gifts of all gathering individuals really inside the requirements of the errand, individual connections and the gathering objectives (Pettinger, 2007). Figure 2: Tuckman’s Model of Group Development (Agile Scrum Guide, 2019) Tuckman in his Model of Group Development gives effectively recognizable stages that a gatherings execution can be estimated against, making it helpful for observing execution, Figure 2 shows Tuckman’s model. Positioning gathering execution against this scale can give pioneers an unmistakable comprehension of how the gathering are working, permitting them to carry out strategies to change this in the event that presentation is inadmissible (Pettinger, 2007). Inside associations, the hypothesis can be inexactly applied to making groups by gathering comfortable people with the point that they will arrive at the norming and performing phase of the model faster. For short and straightforward errands this is an incredibly viable approach to getting sorted out gatherings, because of the expanded momentary efficiency. Anyway there are huge issues with gathering people thusly, especially when assignments become more perplexing, and eventually the model ought to fundamentally be utilized for checking the advancement of gatherings (Pettinger, 2007). Figure 3: Belbin’s Team Roles (PrePearl Training Development, 2019) A more utilitarian methodology of collection people is to use Belbin’s Team Theory (Belbin, 2017). Belbin distinguishes 9 key jobs that should be satisfied inside a gathering to guarantee a positive outcome, the jobs are summed up in Figure 3. The jobs cover a wide range of abilities that should be available inside a gathering to guarantee a positive outcome, and becomes fundamental when assignments are extended and complex. Associations can track down the Belbin jobs every individual fits through a poll, and in this manner adjusted gatherings can be shaped covering every one of the jobs. In any case, as with Fiedler’s possibility model, the hypothesis when meant practice can frequently turn out to be exceptionally unrealistic for associations to consistently execute. This is to a great extent on the grounds that the association is compelled by the characters of their representatives, their might be an overflow of one character type and a shortfall of another, the main arrangement is to enlist remotely to fill the missing jobs inside groups. This can bring about a broad finance for an association and colossal monetary ramifications as they can’t legitimately excuse representative’s assuming they have such a large number of one character type. The significance of Belbin jobs in a group became obvious for Group 1 on the main day of the outside administration course, the gathering had 5 individuals who filled the completer finisher and practitioner jobs, but had nobody filling the asset agent or screen evaluato