Ottoman empire

 

1. Show how what we consider to be purely “European” history is integrated directly with the rest of the world. (Show how your society/topic (Ottoman empire) did not exist in isolation but was influenced and interconnected to others.)
2. Recognize that elements of the past still resonate today (Your society/topic (Ottoman empire) continues to influence and shape the world).
I have attached an example for a slides done on different topic just to get clue about the whole thing.
The home work which is under Ottoman empire, this is the actual home work and it has notes on the side of each slide as a guidance.

 

 

Sample Solution

The Ottoman Empire was a major force in European history and its influence extended far beyond Europe’s borders. It played an important role in the world economy, politics, and culture through its expansive reach into North Africa and the Middle East, Central Asia and the Balkans (Inalcik 1994). The Ottomans opened up trade routes that connected Europe to the Far East, allowing for increased cultural exchange between regions (Kasaba 2000). These networks of communication also introduced Europeans to new ideas about government, science and technology from other parts of the world (Todorova 2009).

Additionally, due to its geographical location lying at the crossroads between east and west,the Ottoman Empire served as a conduit of ideas between different religious traditions such as Christianity and Islam which had significant implications for social change both within Europe itself and internationally (Shaw 1976). This interconnectedness is still present today with many countries in the region retaining aspects of their Ottoman heritage. For example Muslim-majority countries such as Turkey have adopted aspects of Western political ideology while maintaining a strong Muslim identity (McDougall 2006).

Overall, it is clear that what we now consider to be “European” history is deeply rooted in a globalized past where interconnectivity facilitated an increased exchange of knowledge across continents.

regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating to take note of that while there is a limited ability to recall lumps of data, how much pieces in every one of those lumps can change broadly (Miller, 1956). Anyway it’s anything but a straightforward instance of having the memorable option huge pieces right away, somewhat that as each piece turns out to be more natural, it very well may be acclimatized into a lump, which is then recollected itself. Recoding is the interaction by which individual pieces are ‘recoded’ and allocated to lumps. Consequently the ends that can be drawn from Miller’s unique work is that, while there is an acknowledged breaking point to the quantity of pieces of data that can be put away in prompt (present moment) memory, how much data inside every one of those lumps can be very high, without unfavorably influencing the review of similar number

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.