Choose a target population that addresses health outcomes, disparities, and the strategies implemented.
Develop a PowerPoint presentation that outlines your findings. Be sure to format your presentation according to APA and include a reference slide.
• Presentation criteria:
o Overview of Target Population
• Background of population
• How the population is defined
• Size of the population
• Social and demographic characteristics of the population
o Health Outcomes and Disparities
• Analysis of two negative health outcomes and disparities present in the target population
• Explanation of why that exists in the population, prevalence in the population, and historical trends (i.e., has it gotten better or worse in recent decades)
o Social Determinants
• Identify social determinants of health (SDOH) that most closely associates with the negative health outcome and health disparity in the population.
• Describe how SDOH is related to the health outcome and disparities.
o Interventions
• Identify and discuss strategies identified or initiated to address negative health outcome and disparities.
Overview of Target Population
For most people, thinking about health and health care is a very personal issue. Assuring the health of the public, however, goes beyond focusing on the health status of individuals; it requires a population health approach. Approaching health from a population perspective commits the nation to understanding and acting on the full array of factors that affect health. The target population is the group of individuals that the intervention intends to conduct research in and draw conclusions from. People living at or below the poverty level within a given community is an example of target population.
The fourth social hypothesis of Geert Hofstede’s aspect is manliness versus womanliness, which estimates certainty, soul, control and avarice of human relations. In TCC Centers, have no orientation separation, not in beforehand or presently. They generally do need towards crafted by the workers. Every one of the male and female treats similarly around there, they never make any segregate issues (Brandon and Seldman, 2004). Consequently, the manliness versus gentility record is low in TCC.
Resilience of Uncertainty:
Resilience of vulnerability is the fifth social hypothesis of Geert Hofstede’s aspect, which estimates the approach with unidentified circumstances, unexpected happenings and the strain of change. TCC Centers generally alert for any sort of surprising circumstances. Consequently, to stay away from their abrupt vulnerability they generally direct exploration with the ongoing business sector circumstance which made its vulnerability resilience record high.
Independence Vs Collectivism:
The last and last phase of Geert Hofstede’s aspect social hypothesis is independence versus cooperation, which have no administrative ramifications and notices to the gathering instead of the person. For demonstrating the top client, administration is their primary motivation behind the association; they foster their selves to fill in as partner on the grounds that the aftereffect of collaboration generally comes productive and successful (Brandon and Seldman, 2004). Cooperation inside the labor force of TCC is extremely high which permits them to gather and perform out and out collectively.
Hierarchical Politics: In an association, governmental issues are casual and informal which work on the force of the association and let that association to achieve the targets and objectives. Political power impact the dynamic course of an association (Grumana and Saks, 2011). Authoritative legislative issues has both positive and adverse impact towards the efficiency of TCC.
Impact of Politics:
• Governmental issues control admittance to material in an association. In TCC, the governmental issues inside the gatherings who are socially implanted, attempt to impact the functional activities in getting to the authoritative materials.
• It develops the unsatisfactoriness of supports in TCC as the governmental issues among the em