alternative ways of working are not available. If this network becomes so critical to warfare that forces become incapable of fighting in a non-network centric fashion, there is little doubt that any disruption to networks that they are dependent on could be catastrophic and potentially crippling for a military. Nor is there any doubt that a capable enemy would attempt to exploit this weakness by disrupting networks.

5. An Integrated Communication Network provides a level of situational awareness that allows the military to be more flexible, which without doubt increases mission effectiveness. However, it is clear that it is not, by any means without flaws. A heavy reliance on technology is problematic, as it cannot be ruled out that technology may fail, may not be available at the time, and may be targeted by an enemy to reduce war-fighting capability. As the Integrated Communication Network becomes more predominant, steps must be taken to safeguard it from malicious action. It is also imperative that forces can operate in a fall back mode without the network, if required of them. Assuming that these vulnerabilities can be addressed, it has been shown that an Integrated Communication Network is an essential element of modern military operations. It is increasingly relevant to conduct warfare in such a manner that, as a force multiplier, considerably increases a military’s ability to be successful in a wide range of operations.

6. It has been amply displayed that an integrated communication network for the armed forces is going to be the back bone of any Network Centric Operations. However the use of such a capability has not been tested in any major war against an equally capable opponent. Possessing such a capability will also mean that the opponent will make all possible attempts to degrade it. Over reliability on such a system will prove to be fatal if the forces are not trained and prepared to operate in a non networked environment. Therefore an effective integrated communication network commo